Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-17-2004, 12:46 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
|
Historical Jesus vs Historical Other?
Does the Historical Jesus theory really have any more evidence supporting it than, say, a Historical Hercules theory, or a Historical Mithra theory?
I suppose what I'm asking is, can the same methodology used to infer the exitence of a Historical Jesus be successfully applied to other god-men who have a bunch of old books written about them and their miracles? |
03-17-2004, 01:10 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Collingswood, NJ
Posts: 1,259
|
Jesus is about as well attested as Odysseus, though his environs and details about his time are have much more on them.
And having read the Odyssey and the four Gospels, I do prefer the Odyssey. -Wayne |
03-17-2004, 01:57 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 1,831
|
Very good taste, indeed!
|
03-17-2004, 02:17 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
Hey, he is attested in the Iliad as well!
. . . and they found Troy! . . . so he is real! --J.D. |
03-17-2004, 02:42 PM | #5 | |
Beloved Deceased
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 1,539
|
Quote:
|
|
03-17-2004, 05:20 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 59
|
I'd choose Disney's Hercules over the Passion of the Christ any time!
...or not. SBS |
03-17-2004, 10:53 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
|
Does Lucy Lawless appear in The Passion?
No? I think that settles the matter. . . . --J.D. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|