FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2012, 08:36 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Who wrote the Epistle to the Hebrews? The case for Priscillla

On Saturday September 15th's Bible Geek, someone asked about the theory that the author of Hebrews was a woman, namely Priscilla, who is a character in the Book of Acts and also mentioned in the epistles, and Price answered that this was a respectable theory developed first by Adolf Harnack.

Harnack's essay is not readily available. It was translated and published in 1900 in "The Authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews." Lutheran Church Review 19 (1900) and translated again in "Probability about the Address and Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews," pp 392-415 in an out of print book, The Bible Status of Woman, Edited by Lee Anna Starr.

The theory is summarized on Brian Small's blog devoted to Hebrews, Is Priscilla the Author of Hebrews? - although from Price's description, this is too brief a summary.

(These translations must be out of copyright - is there any possibility of finding them and posting them on the web?)

J. Rendel Harris also supported this theory: Rendel Harris on the authorship of Hebrews

Ruth Hoppin picked up the idea in her "Priscilla's Letter: Finding the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews." (or via: amazon.co.uk).

Her book was published in 1997 and then quickly withdrawn, but republished in 2009. The second publisher writes that "Circumstances suggest deliberate suppression, due to the influence of religious extremists who regard the concept of female authorship of the epistle intolerable." Hoppin discusses that in this interview:

Quote:
Priscilla’s Letter was indeed removed from general circulation soon after publication, despite promising initial sales and an obligatory two-year contract. Surreal happenings took place, for example a woman who wanted to review the book in area churches was reprimanded by the publisher for calling repeatedly in order to obtain books in quantity. The melodrama unfolding in 1997 intensified when I sued for breach of contract and suppression. Thanks to the perseverance of attorneys in California and Maryland, I collected a settlement of $70,000 in 2003.
The question of the authorship of Hebrew has its own wikipedia page Authorship_of_the_Epistle_to_the_Hebrews.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 09:00 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 9,176
Default

Fascinating. I generally run about a week behind in listening to the geek, I will have to do that one out of order
dockeen is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 01:07 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I don't know. Clement both (a) thinks the letter is Pauline and (b) is connected with Luke. The only early witness who has doubts about it being written by Paul is Gaius of Rome. The arguments for Priscilla suck because they filter through Acts and Acts suck. The key question to me at least is what does Clement mean by this:

Quote:
He says that the Epistle to the Hebrews is the work of Paul, and that it was written to the Hebrews in the Hebrew language; but that Luke translated it carefully and published it for the Greeks, and hence the same style of expression is found in this epistle and in the Acts. [Church History 6:14]
The author of Hebrews thinks that the sacrifices have come to an end meaning either (i) the letter is apostolic and written by a Samaritan or (ii) the letter was written after 70 CE.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 11:32 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

One problem with having Hebrews written by a woman is that chapter 12 refers to author and readers as having been punished as children by their fathers.

If the author was a woman one would expect that she would have been disciplined when necessary by her mother rather than her father.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 12:24 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

That's actually very impressive Andrew. Do we know though that father's refrained from punishing their daughters? I know that's not true in traditional cultures today.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 12:49 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
That's actually very impressive Andrew. Do we know though that father's refrained from punishing their daughters? I know that's not true in traditional cultures today.
I think mothers were the usual disciplinarians for daughters. I'm sure some daughters were punished by their fathers, but the taken-for-granted nature of paternal discipline in chapter 12 comes more naturally from a male author.

I'm not claiming this is a conclusive argument but chapter 12 does seem to appeal to a shared experience of father son relations.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.