Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-22-2006, 09:22 AM | #1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: I'm down here!
Posts: 1,757
|
Chariots in the red sea
My Uncle sent me this e-mail, and I'd love to refute it. I have spent the last hour searching the IIDB archives, and keep coming up with the Hyksos expulsion. I really would prefer something more about the physical evidence in the sea.
My uncle is an intelligent, open minded man, and has happily read and approved of my sending him refutations to some of his nonsense... but he likes it to directly pertain to what he sends me. The Hyksos matter is interesting, but not exactly germaine, ya know? I'd also like to send him some real background on Ron Wyatt. I'll keep googling, but if anyone has any links to speed the process, that would be great! Back to baking and searching, for me. Quote:
redd |
|
11-22-2006, 10:20 AM | #2 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,729
|
Ron Wyatt is a shyster who has been thoroughly ignored and/or discredited by the scientific community and even by fanatical Christian sites such as Answers In Genesis that would have a great stake in his alleged findings. See this Wikipedia article.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-22-2006, 10:38 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
|
I don't know why I'm dignifying Wyatt's 'work' with any sort of response but... Coral doesn't grow on gold? Funny, I thought it could grow on pretty much anything including rubber. I love how the wheels are 'too fragile to move', another way of saying 'I've got proof but I can't show it to you', pretty much like all his finds.
|
11-22-2006, 10:49 AM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
Ask the Rabbi:
http://ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/273/Q1/ Quote:
|
|
11-22-2006, 11:56 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
|
|
11-22-2006, 05:37 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: I'm down here!
Posts: 1,757
|
pharoah, That's a great link! I'll be sending it along...
Weltall, Is it true or false, that coral will not grow on gold? Everything I've found says it grows on pretty much anything firm/solid. And I've spent much of today looking for evidence for that statement; the ONLY place I've found that statement is on his website. And my son asked the same thing; why can't you move gold, just because there's no wood under it? I have no answer.... gregor, I found that, too. Thanks; it says a lot, and it's in my drafted letter back to Uncle. Malachi 151, I have no idea what your link has to do with what I'm asking. I've been cooking all day, and taking care of a sick child, so I'm pretty sure it must be my scatter brain. Can you please spell out your point? TY. redd |
11-22-2006, 05:39 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
There is no story about crossing the Red Sea at all in the first place, the whole thing stems from a mistranslation.
The real text says the Reed Sea, not the Red Sea. The Reed Sea was a swamp, the story is really completely different than it is portrayed by Christians, as this Jewish Rabbi was explaining. |
11-22-2006, 05:43 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
|
While I can't say with 100% accuracy that it will (I'm just an amateur marine biologist), I'd be willing to bet money that coral bloody well can grow on gold. I know from plenty of personal experience that it can grow on seeded rubber tires and aluminum hulls so it's not much of a stretch.
|
11-22-2006, 06:09 PM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
Quote:
Jeffrey Gibson |
|
11-22-2006, 06:27 PM | #10 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3
|
Sounds to me like a sensationalist with alternative motives.
Finding chariot wheels in the Red Sea should not be surprising. Were chariots not sometimes transported via boat? And could not those been lost at sea? Now to rehash an old argument... 3 million Hebrews crossing the Red Sea 2 abreast: If three million Hebrews participated in the exodus from Egypt (as indicated by the Old Testament) the subsequent line of humans walking two abreast would have resulted in two parallel rows with 1.5 million people in each. Allowing four feet per person, the line would have been 6 million feet long. Dividing 6 million feet by 5,280 feet per mile, the line of Hebrews would have stretched 1,136 miles. That’s about the distance from the northern tip of Michigan to the Gulf of Mexico. However, the distance from Egypt to Canaan is only about 200 miles. The Sinai Peninsula’s shoreline is 130 miles. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|