FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2005, 04:59 PM   #71
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

The Suffering Servant? Are you kidding?

For some reason I thought you'd bring something more sophisticated than that.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 01:48 AM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic
Defining "city" vs. "country" isn't really the issue. My question is whether there is a non-literal way to interpret "stone to death."
It is a question that Metacrock is going to ignore......
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 02:55 AM   #73
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cweb255
Um, where does God say this again? Oh wait, he doesn't.
:banghead:
"Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength."
--Deuteronomy 6:5

"Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD."
--Leviticus 19:18
neozen is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 06:42 AM   #74
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Calzaer: Yes. And, if Jesus is really THE Jesus, Isaiah was a false prophet as well. All sorts of Messianic prophecies that never came to pass were his work.

Metacrock: Not true! Read Edershiem
Calzaer is correct. True. Can you unleash some of Edersheim's brilliance on us? I am sure we'll be overwhelmed by the 120 year old apologetic writings of a converted Jew and missionary.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:14 PM   #75
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
Calzaer is correct. True. Can you unleash some of Edersheim's brilliance on us? I am sure we'll be overwhelmed by the 120 year old apologetic writings of a converted Jew and missionary.

Vorkosigan

why would the Talmud change? One mark of a true scholar is to understand the value of old writtings. It's the mark of a true amature not to appreiciate anything old but to think the only valid info has to be as new as possible.
Metacrock is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:16 PM   #76
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic
The Suffering Servant? Are you kidding?

For some reason I thought you'd bring something more sophisticated than that.


He doesn't even read the page and goes off half cocked with this garage idiocy about "this what everyone says." It's common knowledge. everyone says the SS is not the Messiah, so he can't. end of discussion!
Metacrock is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:20 PM   #77
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,734
Default Suffering Servant, Close reading--inlvoves Edersheim

Use Edersheim to document all the Talmudic passages. The best thing about him is his list of 450 passage and where the Talmud says they are Messinaich. that's invaluable because I don't think a modern list of that kind exists.

hey you specifically asked for Iaiah. What you want, blood from a stove? you want sophisticated, next time as me about Heidegger!

Edit by mod to remove cut and paste.

Please use this URL:


http://www.geocities.com/metacrock20...iah/Isa53.html
Metacrock is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:29 PM   #78
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metacrock
He doesn't even read the page and goes off half cocked with this garage idiocy about "this what everyone says." It's common knowledge. everyone says the SS is not the Messiah, so he can't. end of discussion!
It's common knowledge that the SS is specifically identified as Israel multiple times within the text.

There is not the slightest reason to read it as Messianic. Not the slightest.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:39 PM   #79
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

No Talmudic commentary is meaningful since a.) it's all post CE and b.) it has nothing to do with revealing the intent of the author and the intent of the author is all that matters.

Do some basic research on the OT Messiah. The SS is not even close.

Also, you know it's specious to try to brandish the Gospels as "fulfilled prophecy" since the Gospels were fabricated largely from cherry picked passages, decontextualized and reassembled to create fictional narratives. Do you think Jesus was riding one animal or two when he rode into Jesrusalem?

And watch it with the "idiocy" remarks. I have not insulted you and I have mod powers now.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:56 PM   #80
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Is the word Messiah in Isaiah 53?

Is the word Messiah elsewhere in Isaiah?

Why are the Messianic prophecies in Isaiah, not where Isaiah is talking about the Messiah?

Surely a prophecy all about the Messiah would at least us the word once, if not more times?
Steven Carr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.