FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2004, 07:20 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
No comment for now but does that make Moses one of those who should have been killed for misleading the flock? Wasn't he America's idol and don't they name Christian bookstores "Manna" as well?
Not sure. will have to respond later.
Evoken is offline  
Old 08-29-2004, 09:49 PM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Do you realize that Moses was a bad guy who led the children of Israel into the promised land where they did not belong?

Did you know that they remained children of Israel and wandered for 40 years to die nonetheless because they failed to mature on account of their saved sinner paradox?

Do you realize that manna is bread from heaven but that it was second hand to them and therefore withered with the dying of each day?

Did you know that it is wrong to "part the waters" and just force yourself into the promised land but that, instead, we must learn to "walk on water" first?

Do you still see a capital G there?

Since I don't know what you are referring to, could you elaborate on this, rather than saying "Did you know (insert my opinion here)?"
inquisitive01 is offline  
Old 08-29-2004, 10:11 PM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by inquisitive01
Since I don't know what you are referring to, could you elaborate on this, rather than saying "Did you know (insert my opinion here)?"
The God of Moses doesn't deserve a capital G. That was my point and I told you why I think that.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-30-2004, 12:01 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
The God of Moses doesn't deserve a capital G. That was my point and I told you why I think that.
From my last post: "I don't know what you are referring to."
inquisitive01 is offline  
Old 08-31-2004, 12:04 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by inquisitive01
See Deuteronomy 1:1. There's also an introduction to Deuteronomy at the address below:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...6295-1009.html

The God (with a capital "G") referred to in Deuteronomy would be the God of Moses.
So, Moses being God's mouthpiece; cometh down from the mountain and thus spake to his peoples..(among other things)... "Thou shall not kill*"

*Unless thou is killing in the name of God.
quip is offline  
Old 08-31-2004, 12:44 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quip
So, Moses being God's mouthpiece; cometh down from the mountain and thus spake to his peoples..(among other things)... "Thou shall not kill*"

*Unless thou is killing in the name of God.

Nono, there is no killing in the name of God and there are no laws made in the name of God. The God of Moses was a little-g God who gave him the idea to place a law before humans so it would convict them of sin (he liked their orgies and sought to 'make hay' with it . . . which I think was brilliant and should turn anybody's hair white).

The "thou shalt not kill" is a smokescreen to obscure the subtleness of the sins that go directly against human nature and those are the sins that must convict us as sinner; again, because of their persistence in our rational mind wherein we lust after the flesh (I must assume here that it is not 'natural' for humans to kill each other, but nonetheless, it should be part of the Law).

I should make it clear that, at least in my opinion, the Laws were given to convict man of sin and thus not to stop the act, or actions, that must convict us of sin (hence my "he sought to 'make hay' with that). For this to be possible the Law must be written upon the human heart (as if in stone) so the inner man can convict the outer man of his own wretchedness. Hence we see that "the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only," which makes sin 'good' and from here you can go into Romans 7 to read all about it.

The concept sin now becomes like a fishing bait to catch our human nature and lead it in like a played-out big bass. First to "rouse in me all kinds of evil desire" and later to kill me. Rom.7:11 "Sin found its opportunity and used the commandment: first to deceive me, then to kill me."

It must be noted here that only if sin is a human concept can we ever be set free from the Law and therefore be set free from sin in this life. In the new spirit we are censored by natural law and natural law only which is sufficient for those who have been circumsized by nature itself. Ie, no sin in heaven on earth.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-31-2004, 02:28 PM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quip
So, Moses being God's mouthpiece; cometh down from the mountain and thus spake to his peoples..(among other things)... "Thou shall not kill*"
*Unless thou is killing in the name of God.
Not quite. This gets misinterpreted a lot - why do Christians and Jews eat meat and join the army when it says thou shalt not kill? The word "kill" in that commandment wasn't referring to all killing. It wasn't telling them to become pacifists, or vegetarians, or anti-death penalty activists except in God's name.. It was just saying don't be a Cain. Pretty much the same system we have now. (although I'd have preferred the vegetarian route, myself...)
Shameless Hussy is offline  
Old 08-31-2004, 02:59 PM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shameless Hussy
Not quite. This gets misinterpreted a lot - why do Christians and Jews eat meat and join the army when it says thou shalt not kill? The word "kill" in that commandment wasn't referring to all killing. It wasn't telling them to become pacifists, or vegetarians, or anti-death penalty activists except in God's name.. It was just saying don't be a Cain. Pretty much the same system we have now. (although I'd have preferred the vegetarian route, myself...)
A Christian must resign from politics but Jews are not Christians and the small-c Christians don't know the difference and will cause war to defend their small-g God.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-31-2004, 06:03 PM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shameless Hussy
Not quite. This gets misinterpreted a lot - why do Christians and Jews eat meat and join the army when it says thou shalt not kill? The word "kill" in that commandment wasn't referring to all killing. It wasn't telling them to become pacifists, or vegetarians, or anti-death penalty activists except in God's name.. It was just saying don't be a Cain. Pretty much the same system we have now. (although I'd have preferred the vegetarian route, myself...)

Yeah, Christianity (at least, how it's supposed to be) does seem to get misinterpreted a lot... and stereotyped also, as I recently posted in a Church/State Separation thread. FYI, I do not kill any meat I eat, as it is already in the store for me to purchase. If I were in the Armed services, I would only kill in life-threatening self defense (not intentionally . . . there is a difference). If I kill a spider by accidentally stepping on it (especially if I didn't know it was there in the first place) that is different than intentionally stepping on it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
A Christian must resign from politics but Jews are not Christians and the small-c Christians don't know the difference and will cause war to defend their small-g God.
I would not cause war, but I might state my opinion (just as you've done above). If some self-proclaiming Christians do attempt (or even succeed at) causing a war, should you blame every Christian for that? Of course, you can IF you choose to do so (just as it is you that has chosen the "small-g" route).
inquisitive01 is offline  
Old 08-31-2004, 06:43 PM   #30
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by inquisitive01

I would not cause war, but I might state my opinion (just as you've done above). If some self-proclaiming Christians do attempt (or even succeed at) causing a war, should you blame every Christian for that? Of course, you can IF you choose to do so (just as it is you that has chosen the "small-g" route).
No, I don't blame anyone and if anything I would forgive them for they do not know what they are doing (and this includes Bush).
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.