Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-29-2004, 07:20 PM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2004, 09:49 PM | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Since I don't know what you are referring to, could you elaborate on this, rather than saying "Did you know (insert my opinion here)?" |
|
08-29-2004, 10:11 PM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
08-30-2004, 12:01 AM | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2004, 12:04 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
*Unless thou is killing in the name of God. |
|
08-31-2004, 12:44 PM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Nono, there is no killing in the name of God and there are no laws made in the name of God. The God of Moses was a little-g God who gave him the idea to place a law before humans so it would convict them of sin (he liked their orgies and sought to 'make hay' with it . . . which I think was brilliant and should turn anybody's hair white). The "thou shalt not kill" is a smokescreen to obscure the subtleness of the sins that go directly against human nature and those are the sins that must convict us as sinner; again, because of their persistence in our rational mind wherein we lust after the flesh (I must assume here that it is not 'natural' for humans to kill each other, but nonetheless, it should be part of the Law). I should make it clear that, at least in my opinion, the Laws were given to convict man of sin and thus not to stop the act, or actions, that must convict us of sin (hence my "he sought to 'make hay' with that). For this to be possible the Law must be written upon the human heart (as if in stone) so the inner man can convict the outer man of his own wretchedness. Hence we see that "the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only," which makes sin 'good' and from here you can go into Romans 7 to read all about it. The concept sin now becomes like a fishing bait to catch our human nature and lead it in like a played-out big bass. First to "rouse in me all kinds of evil desire" and later to kill me. Rom.7:11 "Sin found its opportunity and used the commandment: first to deceive me, then to kill me." It must be noted here that only if sin is a human concept can we ever be set free from the Law and therefore be set free from sin in this life. In the new spirit we are censored by natural law and natural law only which is sufficient for those who have been circumsized by nature itself. Ie, no sin in heaven on earth. |
|
08-31-2004, 02:28 PM | #27 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2004, 02:59 PM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2004, 06:03 PM | #29 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Yeah, Christianity (at least, how it's supposed to be) does seem to get misinterpreted a lot... and stereotyped also, as I recently posted in a Church/State Separation thread. FYI, I do not kill any meat I eat, as it is already in the store for me to purchase. If I were in the Armed services, I would only kill in life-threatening self defense (not intentionally . . . there is a difference). If I kill a spider by accidentally stepping on it (especially if I didn't know it was there in the first place) that is different than intentionally stepping on it. Quote:
|
||
08-31-2004, 06:43 PM | #30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|