FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2008, 11:36 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 27
Default Is Paul saying that Jesus was only sent to the people living during his time period?

In Galatians 1:4, it says "that he might deliver us from this present evil world." Does this mean that today's Christians are incorrect in saying that Jesus will deliver them too?
cabio is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 11:48 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Of course, today's Christians are incorrect if they try to read the NT as applying to them.

Paul thought that the end of the corrupt, evil world was imminent. But it's still here.

Paul was wrong. The Jesus portrayed in the gospels is a failed prophet.

Get over it.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 01:16 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 27
Default

But specifically concerning this passage...
cabio is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 01:35 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

How much more specific can I get? Paul was not speaking to the ages - he didn't think there would be people around for the next 2000 years.

If today's Christians think that Jesus will deliver them from CorruptWorld2008, they must have some other basis for thinking so. I don't know what that would be, but it's not Galatians.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 02:36 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 27
Default

Alright, what Paul believed in other accounts can be discussed in other places. Specifically concerning this verse though, I don't think he meant only for the people living during his time period.

The Greek word for world is aiò„n, which is defined as "properly an age; by extension perpetuity (also past); by implication the world; specifically (Jewish) a Messianic period (present or future): - age, course, eternal, (for) ever (-more), [n-]ever, (beginning of the, while the) world (began, without end)." Therefore, it can be seen that a better translation would be "that he might deliver us from this present evil age" with age being a past, present, and future period of time. Therefore, it seems that Christian's are correct in saying that Paul's view, at least in this passage, is that Jesus died for present sinners as well as for the past.
cabio is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 02:45 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Are you trying to say that when Paul referred to the "present" age he also meant all future ages? When did Paul think that the "age" would end?

Why do you think this verse can be read without taking anything else written at the time into account?
Toto is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 02:52 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cabio View Post
In Galatians 1:4, it says "that he might deliver us from this present evil world." Does this mean that today's Christians are incorrect in saying that Jesus will deliver them too?
Paul was clearly concerned about his own times, indeed thought that "time has grown very short" (1 Cor 7:29). Nearly all the NT writers had that same understanding.
t
teamonger is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 10:03 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Are you trying to say that when Paul referred to the "present" age he also meant all future ages? When did Paul think that the "age" would end?

Why do you think this verse can be read without taking anything else written at the time into account?
All I am saying is that taken alone, the language used could include the present day, as well as Paul's day. Taken alone, there is no problem for modern day Christians.

If you want to consider other passages, that can be done.
cabio is offline  
Old 10-22-2008, 11:23 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Nothing is ever a problem for modern day Christians - certainly not logic or consistency or some coherent understanding of the world. Modern Christians read whatever they want to into the scriptures.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 04:44 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cabio View Post
All I am saying is that taken alone, the language used could include the present day, as well as Paul's day. Taken alone, there is no problem for modern day Christians. [Emphasis added.]
I agree. If no consideration is given to context, it can mean just about anything that anybody wants it to mean.

So what?
Doug Shaver is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.