FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2012, 02:52 AM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

While impressive, I can't see how this helps us. If the term used in the brother of Jesus reference follow's Joe's regular use, it tells us that the forger knew what he was doing. If it doesn't, it could just mean that Joe didn't follow his regular practice. The greek and linguistic usage data is the least important data in this dataset about the forged Jesus references in Josephus.

It's more interesting to watch this as an exercise in prestige and legitimation. In New Testament studies Greek plays the same role that statistics does in business or math does in physics: it legitimates the scholarly effort. Interesting how no one ever apologizes for not knowing who referred to Josephus's forged Jesus passages and when, but everyone feels they must defer to knowledge of Greek. Yet mastering the former is far more important in determining the history of the forgery than the latter.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 03:00 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
While impressive, I can't see how this helps us. If the term used in the brother of Jesus reference follow's Joe's regular use, it tells us that the forger knew what he was doing.
Which would be highly improbable.

Quote:
If it doesn't, it could just mean that Joe didn't follow his regular practice. The greek and linguistic usage data is the least important data in this dataset about the forged Jesus references in Josephus.
So what is the most?

Quote:
It's more interesting to watch this as an exercise in prestige and legitimation. In New Testament studies Greek plays the same role that statistics does in business or math does in physics: it legitimates the scholarly effort.
Umm... you can't have physics without the math. And statistics is essential to just about every academic field there is, no matter how often it is misused because those in the field aren't adequately trained. How do you suggest we model any phenomena in physics or science in general without mathematics?

Quote:
Interesting how no one ever apologizes for not knowing who referred to Josephus's forged Jesus passages and when, but everyone feels they must defer to knowledge of Greek.
If you want to say something about a text, it's usually a good idea to be able to read it.

Quote:
Yet mastering the former is far more important in determining the history of the forgery than the latter.
How does one "master" knowing who referred to Josephus? More importantly, how does one use this mastery as some kind of epistemic justification for one's beliefs? After all, most of any classical work, including Josephus, isn't referred to at all in for centuries. If Origen asserts something about Josephus, and we don't find it in Josephus, but we find this line, what are we to conclude?
LegionOnomaMoi is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:32 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: springfield
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LegionOnomaMoi View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
but since I am not a high falutin' Greek expert like you, I have to do it the hard way. I need to see a translation of each passage
We "high falutin' Greek experts" have access to the online Thesaurus Linguae Graecae. Much better methods of searching and many more texts, but no translations.
thanks again for your references.
Do you have access to anything the average punter might not, that questions the existence of an historical jesus?
Or, as someone who has pursued this as a hobby for quite a few years, and had access to quite lot of material, what do you consider is the best work questioning an historical jesus?
And if you wanted to question an historical jesus and argue against us having enough evidence for one, or to argue we have evidence he didn't, what arguments would you use?
thief of fire is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:47 AM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LegionOnomaMoi View Post
Which would be highly improbable.
Yes, it's hard to imagine a smart forger. That just never happens :banghead:

Quote:
Umm... you can't have physics without the math. And statistics is essential to just about every academic field there is, no matter how often it is misused because those in the field aren't adequately trained. How do you suggest we model any phenomena in physics or science in general without mathematics?
That's exactly it, when I was pointing out the social legitimating function of math, stats, and Greek, I meant we could totally do without them. :banghead:

Quote:
How does one "master" knowing who referred to Josephus? More importantly, how does one use this mastery as some kind of epistemic justification for one's beliefs? After all, most of any classical work, including Josephus, isn't referred to at all in for centuries. If Origen asserts something about Josephus, and we don't find it in Josephus, but we find this line, what are we to conclude?
This comment isn't as farcical as your previous ones, so I'll answer it. To trace the forgery, one must know the references to it in subsequent texts. Knowing the Greek here can't help us figure out the arc of the forgery -- when it was introduced, when it starts cropping up, how many variants of it existed in antiquity, in what texts does it occur, who refers to it and how, etc. Since that is the knowledge that really counts in determining the nature of the text, I can see why you are putting so much emphasis on the Greek.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 05:12 AM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post

Yes, it's hard to imagine a smart forger. That just never happens :banghead:
And how many examples of smart forgeries from that period of time are there? How many people knew how to imitate language well enough? There were not many authors capable of writing something like Batrachomyomachia. Additionally, we aren't dealing with a forgery, but a possible interpolation. Do you have any examples of interpolations from the ancient world designed to imitate the original author's speech/writing?


Quote:
This comment isn't as farcical as your previous ones, so I'll answer it. To trace the forgery, one must know the references to it in subsequent texts.
So, assume it is a "forgery", then trace references to it? How do you determine it is a "forgery" in the first place?

Quote:
Knowing the Greek here can't help us figure out the arc of the forgery -- when it was introduced, when it starts cropping up, how many variants of it existed in antiquity
You can't determine this unless you know that an author was specifically quoting the line in question. As you don't, you can't. Paraphrasing doesn't allow you to determine "variants" and assuming the line is a "forgery" and proceeding accordingly doesn't do much at all.
LegionOnomaMoi is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 05:27 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: springfield
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
To trace the forgery, one must know the references to it in subsequent texts. Knowing the Greek here can't help us figure out the arc of the forgery -- when it was introduced, when it starts cropping up, how many variants of it existed in antiquity, in what texts does it occur, who refers to it and how, etc. Since that is the knowledge that really counts in determining the nature of the text, I can see why you are putting so much emphasis on the Greek.

Vorkosigan
So if the words in question were "forged", when must it have happened?
thief of fire is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 06:42 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 1,596
Default

I can't be the only one that saw legomenos and thought oooh, a new lego kit!
Sajara is offline  
Old 06-30-2012, 07:42 AM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sajara View Post
I can't be the only one that saw legomenos and thought oooh, a new lego kit!
I keep hoping...
LegionOnomaMoi is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.