FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2003, 05:35 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: California
Posts: 93
Default

But what about the other Jesuses (or is it Jesi), namely Yeshu ben Pantera and Ben Stada? And isn't there another one who lived in the first century BCE and escaped to Alexandria during the Pharisee persecutions? Maybe there are even more?
Tellurian is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 06:21 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

21 Jesus's

Quote:
The name Jesus appears frequently in the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus. In the Loeb edition of his works the index lists this name no less than twenty-one times referring to different persons, and it is one of the most common names in the index. . . .

The books of Josephus appeared in Greek, and we give the list of names in their Greek form, as given in the index or in the text:
  1. Jesus son of Naue
  2. Jesus son of Saul
  3. Jesus, high priest, son of Phineas
  4. Jesus son of the high priest Jozadak
  5. Jesus son of Joiada
  6. Jesus, high priest, son of Simon
  7. Jesus, high priest, son of Phabes
  8. Jesus, high priest, son of Seee
  9. Jesus the Christ
  10. Jesus son of Damnaeus, became high priest
  11. Jesus son of Gamliel, became high priest
  12. Jesus son of Sapphas
  13. Jesus, chief priest, probably to be identified with 10 or 11
  14. Jesus son of Gamalas, high priest
  15. Jesus, brigand chief on borderland of Ptolemais
  16. Jesus son of Sapphias
  17. Jesus brother of Chares
  18. Jesus a Galilean, perhaps to be identified with 15
  19. Jesus in ambuscade, perhaps to be identified with 16
  20. Jesus, priest, son of Thebuthi
  21. Jesus son of Ananias, rude peasant, prophesies the fall of Jerusalem
Toto is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 12:36 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
The name Jesus appears frequently in the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus.
21 jesii thats more than the amount of elvii my goodness what a mess of spaghetti.

Now toto who is the one written in the NT?or were there many written about?How do we clean up the mess of tangled spaghetti,
mark9950 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 03:56 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default

Toto - that was very interesting link. Thanks.

Quite a blow to the TF crowd, IMHO.

No tangled pasta Mark. Myth drawn from multiple sources.
rlogan is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 11:42 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I recommend Leidner's book (see this) although he does get off on some speculations that go beyond the possibility of proof.

Leider thinks that the NT Jesus is based on the OT Joshua son of Nun (Jesus is the Greek for the Hebrew Joshua.)

For another Jesus, see this thread: Two Jesuses: Weeden on XTALK, where it is opined that some aspects of Jesus are based on the crazy Jesus son of Ananias.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 12:29 PM   #16
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That would all make sense if Jesus was the name given to the new identity of Joseph after the son of man was born unto him by means of rebirth. Hence, the two Jesus' of which one was married when the adam nature referred to as Jesus bar Joseph took the eve nature here called Magdalene to be his wife. It is in this sense that they were married and it is only in this sense that they were married.

I should add here that the son of man identity here called Jesus -Bar Abbas was the true identity of the man called Joseph who was a carpenter and therefore co-creater with the creator here reborn.
 
Old 11-22-2003, 03:08 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default

Toto - Thanks again. You did a nice review of that, and I'm going to get it.

In my own mind, I had been forming the "composite" Jesus picture. Having so many with that name certainly bolsters this approach.

I would have to agree that once the "witnesses" (The Bible, the Church "Fathers, etc") have been impeached so many times the burden of proof for the veracity of Acts is upon the apologists.

Amos - I am curious if you have made up your own school of thought and terminology - or is there some existing school of thought you are following?
rlogan is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 03:09 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
where it is opined that some aspects of Jesus are based on the crazy Jesus son of Ananias.
That would make sense because of the incident of cursing the fig tree when he knew figs were out of season.

Scourging the people in the temple.

Thinking he was a god.

This is sure signs of a crazy man.
mark9950 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 03:13 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
No tangled pasta Mark. Myth drawn from multiple sources.
Definately.
mark9950 is offline  
Old 11-22-2003, 09:27 PM   #20
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by rlogan


Amos - I am curious if you have made up your own school of thought and terminology - or is there some existing school of thought you are following?
No, rlogan, it's not my own school of thought but it is not so that I follow someone elses thoughts. It is just that I recognize my thoughts in the bible and that is why I present it that way.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.