FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-17-2006, 12:37 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?: Jesus cries out in the words of Psalm 22:2, a psalm of lament that is the Old Testament passage most frequently drawn upon in this narrative. In Mark the verse is cited entirely in Aramaic, which Matthew partially retains but changes the invocation of God to the Hebrew Eli, possibly because that is more easily related to the statement of the following verse about Jesus' calling for Elijah.
Neither because it does not pertain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
Personaly, I can see this as Jesus staring down at us and waiting for us to save him, and in effect save us all. His "Father" had promised him that he put inside men's heads the higher thoughts, compassion, empathy, and guilt.

When no one came forward with any of these to stop it, in a center part of this story it is said Jesus needed only 2 people to stand up for him, not 1 did.
Again untrue. The christian belief is exactly this corruption and it is metioned three times in matthew. The so-called "saving us all" was what actually happened as believed written.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
Why have you forsaken me on this cross when you said that they had this inside them Father? You created them, then why did compassion not work in them? How can they watch a human suffer like this and not say anything?

No compassion was shown to him, yet it is in all of us to be able to give compassion, it just was forsaken and withheld from "God's Son" by us at the time.
Exactly, because jesus was a false prophet ordered by god to be killed. Such hypocrisy from one who enjoys other's suffering. His "father" was a fellow conspirator as Deuteronomy warns. The voice from the passage shows this only too clear in its handling.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 12:38 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus
I understand that this is the Talmudic understanding.
Are there examples in Tanach ?
You were the one who brought this up as though it were a Bat Kol. I just found it interesting.

Instead it is a corruption formed to try to sway the ignorant.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 01:35 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon45
You were the one who brought this up as though it were a Bat Kol. I just found it interesting. Instead it is a corruption formed to try to sway the ignorant.
A textual corruption from the original NT ? Naah ... we have the Received Text.

Shabbat Shalom
Steven Avery is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 02:21 PM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon45
Neither because it does not pertain.

Again untrue. The christian belief is exactly this corruption and it is metioned three times in matthew. The so-called "saving us all" was what actually happened as believed written.

Exactly, because jesus was a false prophet ordered by god to be killed. Such hypocrisy from one who enjoys other's suffering. His "father" was a fellow conspirator as Deuteronomy warns. The voice from the passage shows this only too clear in its handling.
I have a different view, The true world of "God" did not come, only had he been pulled down, would it have come.

The falsness of this account lies in the Disciples "understanding" and their "interupting" of his meaning were those who taught false. If I would listen then it would be by example, they should have matched Jesus' if they wanted to be heard.

I see none of the "Older" prophets as wrong, I see them pointing to those who needed discipline, to be taught. They still failed miserably. To me these are the ones who "taught" what he said, all wrong.

Heck Jesus interviewed over 400 people, he chose the weakest, this is why I only take his teaching out of the entire New Testament, those who call true prophets false, did so only for their own glory.

Humanity had a chance, that is the free will he gave us, how many times does it say ooo you rebels, never listen and you will do it to yourselves. We did not listen to those little voices put there by "God" screaming "Tell them to stop it;" maybe next time we will. The world would not be at war today if we had.

KMS
CaliNORML is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 06:53 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by praxeus
A textual corruption from the original NT ? Naah ... we have the Received Text.
No, there was an original, it was the Torah, then much later came the corruption known as the NT. John 12:27-30 is just a small clear example of that corruption.

Only the NT believes the Messiah is to taken through a torturous death because the writers misunderstood the Tanach and its real prophetic teachings.

The voice was of course provided for the attention of the crowd, but anyone knowledgeable with scripture would have known this can't possibly be actually from god.

The real god that was from the Tanach does not need to be told by anyone especially a false prophet or even by himself to bring glory to his name. He would never need to state that he has already done so and will so again because it would have been already obvious to the Jews around then since they were already worshipping this god until jesus came along to try to lead them away.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 06:54 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southwest, US
Posts: 8,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
I have a different view, The true world of "God" did not come, only had he been pulled down, would it have come.
No, neither pertains because it has nothing to do with jesus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
The falsness of this account lies in the Disciples "understanding" and their "interupting" of his meaning were those who taught false. If I would listen then it would be by example, they should have matched Jesus' if they wanted to be heard.
No again. It is the NT's writers that got it all wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
I see none of the "Older" prophets as wrong, I see them pointing to those who needed discipline, to be taught. They still failed miserably. To me these are the ones who "taught" what he said, all wrong.
They can't fail since they are being directed by god.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
Heck Jesus interviewed over 400 people, he chose the weakest, this is why I only take his teaching out of the entire New Testament, those who call true prophets false, did so only for their own glory.
Where do you get this number? Besides, jesus already did enough of a job mocking the prophets with his pathetic accounting and interpretations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
...how many times does it say ooo you rebels, never listen and you will do it to yourselves.
I agree with this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNORML
We did not listen to those little voices put there by "God" screaming "Tell them to stop it;" maybe next time we will. The world would not be at war today if we had.
Probably right, because then there would never have been christianity.
sharon45 is offline  
Old 03-18-2006, 07:20 PM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon45
No, there was an original, it was the Torah, then much later came the corruption known as the NT. John 12:27-30 is just a small clear example of that corruption.

Only the NT believes the Messiah is to taken through a torturous death because the writers misunderstood the Tanach and its real prophetic teachings.

The voice was of course provided for the attention of the crowd, but anyone knowledgeable with scripture would have known this can't possibly be actually from god.

The real god that was from the Tanach does not need to be told by anyone especially a false prophet or even by himself to bring glory to his name. He would never need to state that he has already done so and will so again because it would have been already obvious to the Jews around then since they were already worshipping this god until jesus came along to try to lead them away.
In what way did Jesus try to lead the Jews astray? What was it about Compassion that was such a radical act, when they were supposedly the first to recieve it? It seems they were more worried about "Mans" politics and social stauts to spread any compassion at all.

Even to his mother, was Mary not of the Jewish faith?

KMS
CaliNORML is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.