FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2008, 08:54 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Chili's take has been split off here
Toto is offline  
Old 12-15-2008, 04:02 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: land of the home, free of the brave
Posts: 9,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by credoconsolans View Post

Guess you and Robert Miller haven't read your bibles lately.
And I'm guessing that since you do your analysis of Greek texts on the basis of English translations of them, you went to the Yuri Kuchinsky school of Biblical exegesis, that you don't read Greek (you should be consulting BDAG or LSJ, not an English dictionary for the meanings of εὑρ�*θη ἐν γαστρὶ and πνεύματος ἁγίου), that you haven't read Miller and that you are wholly unaware of and uninformed about the significance of the use of ἐκ Greek expressions speaking of generation.

Now please tell me where it is in GMatthew that Mathew actually enumerates the number of Kings he speaks of in Mt. 2, let alone that however many he says there were, they are depicted as being led by a star to a stable.

Jeffrey


Well, if we were talking about the oldest Greek copy I would be more specific, but we're not are we? We're talking about the story as per our current Western culture in an offshoot of a discussion re a DVD about the star of Bethlehem.
credoconsolans is offline  
Old 12-15-2008, 07:49 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by credoconsolans View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post

And I'm guessing that since you do your analysis of Greek texts on the basis of English translations of them, you went to the Yuri Kuchinsky school of Biblical exegesis, that you don't read Greek (you should be consulting BDAG or LSJ, not an English dictionary for the meanings of εὑρ�*θη ἐν γαστρὶ and πνεύματος ἁγίου), that you haven't read Miller and that you are wholly unaware of and uninformed about the significance of the use of ἐκ Greek expressions speaking of generation.

Now please tell me where it is in GMatthew that Mathew actually enumerates the number of Kings he speaks of in Mt. 2, let alone that however many he says there were, they are depicted as being led by a star to a stable.

Jeffrey


Well, if we were talking about the oldest Greek copy I would be more specific, but we're not are we?
Given that you were the one who chided me for not reading "my" Bible, yes we are.

But let's say no. Let's that were not talking about what's in the oldest Greek copy of Matthew (or any other Greek copy for that matter). Where is it in any non Greek "copy" of the Gospel of Matthew, including English ones, does Mathew actually enumerates the number of Kings he speaks of in Mt. 2, let alone that however many he says there were, they are depicted as being led by a star to a stable?

In any case, thanks for confirming, by dodging my other questions, that you don't read Greek, you have no idea what the Greek expressions εὑρ�*θη ἐν γαστρὶ and πνεύματος ἁγίου connoted in the first century, that you haven't read Miller, and that you are wholly unaware of, and uninformed about, the significance of the use of ἐκ in Greek expressions speaking of generation.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 02:00 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

I have now watched this video.

The fellow uses Starry Night software to recreate ancient celestial events that he thinks would have led the Magi to travel from Babylon to Jerusalem. Apparently this software (which looks really cool) allows one to select any spot on the earth (or even on the moon!), along any date and time in history, and observe what the night sky would have looked like at that moment.

I lack the astronomical expertise to question any of the astronomical data in the video; for all I know, Jupiter and Venus did come into conjunction at some point in 2 BCE and so forth.

What interests me are the claims, very fleetingly defended, that (A) Herod died in 1 BCE instead of 4 BCE and that (B) Jesus died in 33. The latter is a date that has been seriously considered, though I tend to think 30 is more likely, but the former seems truly problematic IMVHO.

The most specific claim in connection with the death of Herod is that all Josephus manuscripts dating to before 1544 (the date of the editio princeps) support 1 BCE as the death year for Herod. The video does not go into any more details on this than the website, which divides the discussion up as follows:

Comments?

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 02:30 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

The discussion of Herod footnotes Ernest L. Martin, The Star that Astonished the World (or via: amazon.co.uk). I have not read that book, but Martin has an article in Chronos, Kairos, Christos (or via: amazon.co.uk) in which he does the redating of the death of Herod. This article, happily, is available nearly in its entirety on Google Books.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 12-19-2008, 08:43 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Starry Night software.

I use that software with my telescope, when it isn't raining in Amsterdam, of course. It is cool.
dog-on is offline  
Old 12-19-2008, 04:20 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Is this the same theory? Christianity Today: Searching for the Star of Bethlehem

Quote:
Using powerful computer software, an Australian astronomer says that he has re-created the night sky over Bethlehem in the year 2 B.C. and discovered a planetary conjunction that may have been the Star of Bethlehem that drew the Magi to worship the baby Jesus.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 07:28 PM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Is this the same theory? Christianity Today: Searching for the Star of Bethlehem

Quote:
Using powerful computer software, an Australian astronomer says that he has re-created the night sky over Bethlehem in the year 2 B.C. and discovered a planetary conjunction that may have been the Star of Bethlehem that drew the Magi to worship the baby Jesus.
Planets are too high to appear to be over a single house. A planet that appears overhead would also appear to be over everyone's head within many miles.

A planet that appears to be over a house in Bethlehem would also appear to be over everyone's house in the same area.

And further due to the rotation of the earth, a planet would in general, almost always appear to be moving opposite to the earth's rotation.

But, in any event, planets are too high to appear to be over one single specific building.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 08:17 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Planets are too high to appear to be over a single house. A planet that appears overhead would also appear to be over everyone's head within many miles.

A planet that appears to be over a house in Bethlehem would also appear to be over everyone's house in the same area.

And further due to the rotation of the earth, a planet would in general, almost always appear to be moving opposite to the earth's rotation.

But, in any event, planets are too high to appear to be over one single specific building.
I agree.
It has always seemed wierd to me that a star or group of stars could ever be seen to "point" to a particular spot on earth.
The "spot" would keep moving and where on earth would you be able to say that a star points to a spot at all - if it was near the horizon, then maybe but the problem is that as you got closer to that spot the star would seem to move.

it is total crap if you ask me.
Transient is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 09:39 PM   #20
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Default

Jeff and Lee show interviewed Rick Larson about this theory.
Download the MP3 from their archive to listen what this DVD is about.
go to kkms.com/JeffandLee/11597003/
In the end of the MP3 he will reveal his great theory.
louhi is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.