FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2004, 10:00 PM   #301
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Doing Yahzi's laundry
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed
God has given different roles for each gender, each gender is different as science has shown.
Science has shown that restrictions should be placed on women in terms of expressing their full potential?
greyline is offline  
Old 06-18-2004, 09:32 AM   #302
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed
Not trivial considering that it is evidence that the ancient hebrews knew that men were psychologically different from women thousands of years before science 'discovered" that fact.
Yawn. As if everybody else had considered the sexes to be psychologically identical.

I don't think that the two sexes are exactly alike psychologically, but they do strongly resemble each other in important ways. For example, both sexes use the same grammar when they use the languages that they speak -- there's no "men's grammar" and "women's grammar" of natural languages. Do men tend to prefer subject-verb-object sentence order and women subject-object-verb? Or vice versa? Or some other orders?

(God wanting male leadership...)
Quote:
See above.
Where???

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich
Look at this site -- there is a larger fraction of female moderators and admins than there is female rulers in the Bible. And check on who won the popularity contest in the "crush" thread in the Lounge.

... But why do us unsaved hellbound godless heathens beat the authors of the world's greatest book in that respect?
Beat them at what? They didn't have computer moderators and admins in ancient times.
Pure literal-mindedness. Imagine female community leaders, female poets and bards, etc.

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich
But why did any women at all become priestesses? Did those pagan religions have something that the religion of the Bible's writers had lacked?
No, the reverse. And because they had priestesses they were led down the wrong spiritual path.
And why is that supposed to be the case?


(why different roles for the two sexes...)
Quote:
Its called research, duuuh.
And what research was that?
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-19-2004, 08:39 PM   #303
Ed
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
lp: There is further counterevidence: many people in ancient times did things that they would not have done if they had been perpetually on the brink of starvation, like dancing, creating artwork, building big buildings, and so forth.

ED: No, only the ruling elite could do such things. The ordinary people were just trying to survive generally speaking.

jtb: Nonsense. The invention of agriculture meant that ordinary people had plenty of time on their hands when it wasn't harvest season.
Evidence that in ancient times the ordinary people initiated construction of the pyramids and other major building programs and major works of art?

Quote:
Ed: In the surrounding pagan societies women were often considered subhuman and purely property.

lp: Evidence?

Ed: Ask your local history professor.

jtb: Translation: "I made that up".

I see no evidence that your knowledge of ancient Caananite societies is any better than your knowledge of Hebrew.
You obviously didn't ask your history professor.

Quote:
lp: However, women could become priestesses and the like in the religions of their neighbors.

Ed: Not in all of them, many were forced to become temple prostitutes.

jtb: I will again remind you that you have presented NO evidence that ANY women were EVER forced to become temple prostitutes.
Fraid so, see above.

Quote:
jtb: This is equivalent to saying that the Catholic church must have forced women to become nuns because a lifetime of celibacy is so unnatural that no woman would ever choose this voluntarily.
Actually in some periods of history they did. And also the ones that did do it voluntarily were compelled by their belief that God wanted them to. Even though if God had not compelled them to they probably would not have done it.
Ed is offline  
Old 06-19-2004, 08:48 PM   #304
Ed
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich
(me on this site, its female mods and admins, and how two of its most notable achievers are female)
Originally Posted by Ed
I would hardly call attempts to convince people of lies about reality a "great achievement".

lp: Whatever counts as "lies about reality".
Trying to convince people God does not exist.

Quote:
lp: Ed, you may enjoy christ-on-a-stick's salvation story, her adventures in fundyland. QueenofSwords has composed no comparable document, though she's described her religious journey in several places here. She had been raised a Catholic, and she had become a born-again at the age of 16. However, she started Bible class for her parents, and despite the soporific quality of some books of it, she stubbornly continued onward, becoming skeptical of it as a result. And she eventually became one of us. Be sure to check out her Nutwatches.

Also, Ed, don't forget to try to translate the Hebrew I'd posted here. You will greatly appreciate what you find when you do so.
There are clues in all those stories that reveal that the real reasons these young ladies left Christianity had nothing to do with the "lack of evidence".
Ed is offline  
Old 06-19-2004, 08:53 PM   #305
Ed
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich
(everybody having committed some sins...)

But does everybody deserve eternal damnation as a result? Even if they otherwise do lots of Good Things?
Yes, because we never do good things for the right reason.
Ed is offline  
Old 06-19-2004, 11:38 PM   #306
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Default

Hey guys, just thought I'd interrupt. This thread has official sent me crazy, I'm now afraid of plain geometrical shapes.



Strangely enough, for those who're too lazy to read the last 10 pages, that pretty much sums em up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed

Ed: In the surrounding pagan societies women were often considered subhuman and purely property.

lp: Evidence?

Ed: Ask your local history professor.

jtb: Translation: "I made that up".

I see no evidence that your knowledge of ancient Caananite societies is any better than your knowledge of Hebrew.

ed: You obviously didn't ask your history professor.
Ok ed lets say that he didn't ask his history prof. You made the statement, so you must've got the knowledge from somewhere. Care to back it up with some evidence?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed
lp: However, women could become priestesses and the like in the religions of their neighbors.

Ed: Not in all of them, many were forced to become temple prostitutes.

jtb: I will again remind you that you have presented NO evidence that ANY women were EVER forced to become temple prostitutes.

ed: Fraid so, see above.

Lets pretend that this is a new thread, and theres no vauge post somewhere in the last 12 pages to reference back to with "see above" - could we have some solid evidence that this is the case?

And to get back to something intesting from the debate.. the documentary hypothesis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed

[ss: someone, cant remember] makes the same mistake of basing most of his argument on the fatally flawed Documentary Hypothesis. He uses it as an excuse to take verses out of context. See above for some of the problems with it. (ss: emphasis mine)
I dont pretend to know very much at all about the documentary hypothesis, but I was under the impression that it was very solid. Would you be able to point out the basic "fatal flaws" in it for me? Dont write a thesis or anything, just give me something to research around - a few points would suffice.

-secular spoon

ps. Jack and lpetrich, I'm in awe of you're staying power. :notworthy I woulda given up months ago.
secular spoon is offline  
Old 06-20-2004, 04:33 AM   #307
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed
Evidence that in ancient times the ordinary people initiated construction of the pyramids and other major building programs and major works of art?
Ask your local history professor.

Joking aside, when did anyone say anything about initiating construction? Or that the projects were major? If they were able to build or create artwork, whether or not they initiated the construction or if the projects were major, means that they weren't just trying to survive. And I doubt that the ruling elite constructed buildings themselves.
Resistor is offline  
Old 06-20-2004, 10:13 AM   #308
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

(do christ-on-a-stick and QueenofSwords really tell "lies about reality"?)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed
Trying to convince people God does not exist.
How do they supposedly do that?

Quote:
There are clues in all those stories that reveal that the real reasons these young ladies left Christianity had nothing to do with the "lack of evidence".
How would that be apparent from christ-on-a-stick's Salvation Story?

Or from anything that QueenofSwords has stated? Like her self-intro. When she started some self-directed Bible study, she discovered that "I couldn't believe half the stuff I read; the other half was believable and very, very sad", and started becoming skeptical. And as explained in this reading-the-Bible thread, she refused to practice selective reading. As described in this atheist-testimony thread, she found the eternal damnation of her Muslim friends and the rejection of evolution too much to swallow.

More recently, in this Heaven thread, she has stated:
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueenofSwords
Give me some more reasons as to why I would want to spend eternity in the presence of the god who slaughtered the Egyptian first-born and ordered women to be stoned if they didn't bleed on their wedding nights. Then we'll talk.
Ed, does it look like she has any ulterior motives other than dislike of cruelty? Seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich
(everybody having committed some sins...)

But does everybody deserve eternal damnation as a result? Even if they otherwise do lots of Good Things?
Yes, because we never do good things for the right reason.
And what is the "right" reason? And why does failure to do good things for the reason indicate that one deserves eternal damnation? Yes, being agonizingly tortured forever and ever and ever.

And Ed, don't you think the idea of eternal damnation is a bit on the cruel side?
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-20-2004, 06:11 PM   #309
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Doing Yahzi's laundry
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich
And what is the "right" reason? And why does failure to do good things for the reason indicate that one deserves eternal damnation? Yes, being agonizingly tortured forever and ever and ever.
Isn't the right reason the anticipation of eternal life? Morally bankrupt though it may be.
greyline is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 09:22 PM   #310
Ed
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
jtb: A Hebrew woman would have thought so, yes. The Celts allowed women to become warriors. Try telling a single Celtic woman that she couldn't survive without a man, and you'd probably find out what a Celtic longsword can do.

Ed: A celtic woman may have THOUGHT she could survive without men but she would be dead wrong. It is a scientific fact that men are stronger than women.

jtb: She could CERTAINLY have survived without men.

She could tend goats JUST as easily as a man, fired a bow at attacking marauders just as effectively as a man, and dismbowelled an attacker almost as effectively as a man: certainly good enough to kill.

Your misogyny is showing, Ed.
A well trained swordsman would end up disembowelling a well trained swordswoman almost everytime. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Quote:
jtb: I note that you've still not explained why the "morally superior" Hebrews would allow Caananite raiders across their borders to attack unmarried women only.

Ed: They didn't have a massive border patrol like modern nations nor a police force.

jtb: Try answering the question.

Please explain why their border patrols stopped and interrogated marauders, asked them their business, and allowed them to pass if they were after UNMARRIED Hebrew women.
Huh? I never said that is what they did. They didn't really have what we would call border patrols. And ALL marauders would be attacked if they were known to exist. I was just saying that if some marauders made it into Israel then unmarried women would be very vulnerable to attack.

Quote:
jtb:..Oh, dear. After a comparison with the Holocaust was made, you now seek to make excuses by using a verse which justifies the Holocaust.

...So you think the Jews deserved to die in the Nazi camps because "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"?

The Bible says exactly why the Amalekites were killed: because of the actions of their ancestors. You know this: it is inescapable.

Ed: They deserved to die just as we all do, but they DID NOT deserve to die by the hands of the Nazis.

jtb: ...So those killed by Nazis are "more dead"? Or do they go to a lower circle of Hell?

Please explain why being killed by Nazis is worse than being killed by Hebrews.
Because God would have let most of them live fairly long lives and die of natural causes. God only killed using hebrews those peoples that occupied the Promised Land.
Ed is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.