FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2005, 12:03 PM   #81
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Timothy G. Muse
A few observations/statements:
1. It's interesting to see HOW INTENT unbelievers are to try to ascribe to believers a belief they do not hold and openly dismiss.
Nah - we just like to see you squirm.

Quote:
2. It's interesting to see how unbelievers fail to acknowledge the witness of history. (While some examples can be pointed to where some have killed in the name of Christianity, this is not the normative practice of Christians, nor are these situations looked upon as heroic examples by Christians.)
Witness of history :rolling:

You mean - Constantine? the Crusades? the Inquisition? The Chaplains in every Christian army that has fought any other Christian army?

Quote:
2. It's interesting to see how unbelievers fail to recognize distinctions of genre and dispensations.
This thread does not support that.

Quote:
3. It's interesting to see how unbelievers fail to recognize that killing serves no purpose for believers in that Christ's kingdom is not of this world! (Caveat: Civil authority is granted the sword for the purpose of preservation, protection, and the punishment of those who do wrong.)
Tell that to all those Christians through history.

Quote:
4. It's interesting to see how unbelievers overlook Jesus' own example in telling Peter to put his sword away, for not only will God repay man according to his deeds, but Christ will not have his ministers or his people propagate his religion by force of arms.
I think you misinterpret that passage. In that case, Jesus didn't want Peter fighting the Romans, since that would have upset his grand plan. Jesus also said he would bring not peace, but the sword, and those words were more prophetic.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 12:37 PM   #82
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Timothy G. Muse
A few observations/statements:
It's interesting to see HOW INTENT unbelievers are to try to ascribe to believers a belief they do not hold and openly dismiss.
My INTENT is to ascribe to christian believers the belief in an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god.

If you do not ascribe to that belief, I apologize for erroneously ascribing to you such a belief. If you do, say so, and we'll move on to discussing the nature of god.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 12:41 PM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brandon, Mississippi
Posts: 1,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Nah - we just like to see you squirm.
This response I can buy, though from a biblical perspective it's more than that.

Quote:
witness of history :rolling:

You mean - Constantine? the Crusades? the Inquisition? The Chaplains in every Christian army that has fought any other Christian army?
Yes. You named three[not counting Chaplains] (and the normative Christian today admits these were misguided in some of their actions... but unbelievers never seem to hear Christians say this, but rather keep bringing it up like a broken record.)

I may be mistaken, but I don't think military Chaplains brandish weapons.

Quote:
This thread does not support that.
Seems pretty literalist in applying Jesus' parable to individuals in the present.

Quote:
I think you misinterpret that passage. In that case, Jesus didn't want Peter fighting the Romans, since that would have upset his grand plan. Jesus also said he would bring not peace, but the sword, and those words were more prophetic
You misinterpret the passage. The sword Jesus came to bring was not a physical one.
Rev. Timothy G. Muse is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 12:44 PM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brandon, Mississippi
Posts: 1,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
My INTENT is to ascribe to christian believers the belief in an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god.

If you do not ascribe to that belief, I apologize for erroneously ascribing to you such a belief. If you do, say so, and we'll move on to discussing the nature of god.
That's not what I was talking about. In this thread, unbelievers are zealously intent on trying to say Christianity suggests Christians should kill unbelievers, when that is CLEARLY NOT THE CASE!
Rev. Timothy G. Muse is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 12:56 PM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
"My INTENT is to ascribe to christian believers the belief in an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god.

If you do not ascribe to that belief, I apologize for erroneously ascribing to you such a belief. If you do, say so, and we'll move on to discussing the nature of god."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Timothy G. Muse
That's not what I was talking about. In this thread, unbelievers are zealously intent on trying to say Christianity suggests Christians should kill unbelievers, when that is CLEARLY NOT THE CASE!

You still haven't answered my question. I can see why.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 12:59 PM   #86
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brandon, Mississippi
Posts: 1,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
"My INTENT is to ascribe to christian believers the belief in an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god.

If you do not ascribe to that belief, I apologize for erroneously ascribing to you such a belief. If you do, say so, and we'll move on to discussing the nature of god."




You still haven't answered my question. I can see why.
Yes. I believe in an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god. (The reason I did not answer this is that it seems to sidetrack the thread - Does the Bible anywhere order Christians to kill?)
Rev. Timothy G. Muse is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 01:10 PM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Timothy G. Muse
A few observations/statements:
1. It's interesting to see HOW INTENT unbelievers are to try to ascribe to believers a belief they do not hold and openly dismiss.
Have you read the thread? It has nothing to do with the beliefs of believers. It is entirely focused on what the believers' Holy Book actually says. That some believers are willing to dismiss the apparent meaning of a given passage is irrelevant to that apparent meaning unless the dismissal is accompanied by a rational basis for reinterpreting the passage.

Quote:
2. It's interesting to see how unbelievers fail to acknowledge the witness of history. (While some examples can be pointed to where some have killed in the name of Christianity, this is not the normative practice of Christians, nor are these situations looked upon as heroic examples by Christians.)
2. It's interesting to see how unbelievers fail to recognize distinctions of genre and dispensations.
3. It's interesting to see how unbelievers fail to recognize that killing serves no purpose for believers in that Christ's kingdom is not of this world! (Caveat: Civil authority is granted the sword for the purpose of preservation, protection, and the punishment of those who do wrong.)
How are any of these observations relevant to establishing what the Bible actually says with regard to the question in the OP?

Quote:
4. It's interesting to see how unbelievers overlook Jesus' own example in telling Peter to put his sword away, for not only will God repay man according to his deeds, but Christ will not have his ministers or his people propagate his religion by force of arms.
Passages that can be interpreted to prohibit killing are irrelevant to the question of the OP as well as to understanding any passage that might be offered to answer the question in the affirmative.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 01:25 PM   #88
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Timothy G. Muse
Yes. You named three[not counting Chaplains] (and the normative Christian today admits these were misguided in some of their actions... but unbelievers never seem to hear Christians say this, but rather keep bringing it up like a broken record.)
Umm, look up the history of the "Crusades" and the "Inquisition". Both are general terms for periods of church history that each covered hundreds of years. Note that "Crusades" is plural. It's not "the Crusade". And there was more than one Inquisition as well.

Quote:
Seems pretty literalist in applying Jesus' parable to individuals in the present.
So Jesus' parable doesn't apply to individuals today? How 'bout the rest of his parables and words? Can we dismiss them as well? Is this a general practice among Chrisitians, to dismiss the more difficult words of Jesus as "not applying to us"? "Well, we don't have to take what Jesus said literally?
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 01:49 PM   #89
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Timothy G. Muse
. . .
Yes. You named three[not counting Chaplains] (and the normative Christian today admits these were misguided in some of their actions... but unbelievers never seem to hear Christians say this, but rather keep bringing it up like a broken record.)
Only in some of their actions??

Hey - you were the one who brought up history.

Under the influence of humanism and rationalism, Christians have reluctantly admitted that some previous Christians were not True Christians. But somehow they have a hard time explaining why Christianity missed the point of Jesus' message of peace for so many centuries, and why today's Christians have a more accurate interpretation.

This seems like a good time to link to this: Pope Leo I weighs in on the Papacy

Quote:
I may be mistaken, but I don't think military Chaplains brandish weapons.
. . .
No, they just encourage an enable those who do.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-19-2005, 02:38 PM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,708
Default

I alluded to this before but God commands his followers to kill over and over in the OT. Christians are let off the hook though if they don't think they have to follow The Law. Several Christians I've asked, though, have responded that it pleases God for them to follow the 10 Commandments. They have also said that it would probably be pleasing to God to follow all of The Law. They have not answered me as to why they don't then follow it other than to say, "it is not required."

So, yes, God orders Christians to kill many times in the Bible.
Javaman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.