Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-27-2008, 05:35 AM | #11 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
|
Quote:
or how about something like the day of the gentiles. is this one day? or, in modern English, if you prefer. it could be a phrase like "I was young back in the day". What 24 hour period am I referring to? Sorry, if you want to catch God in a lie, you have to learn Hebrew for yourself. ~Steve |
|||
05-27-2008, 05:45 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
|
In other words, God writes in a vague and ambiguous manner in order to drive everyone crazy while trying to interpret Him.
|
05-27-2008, 06:14 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
|
Quote:
bye the way, the definition I gave came from a Hebrew dictionary. there is nothing particularly theistic about it. ~Steve |
|
05-27-2008, 06:42 AM | #14 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
And, in retrospect, we have no idea what many things in the Bible really mean. What is a "tree of the knowledge of good and evil"? |
||
05-27-2008, 07:36 AM | #15 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
Besides, had the two obeyed, the Bible would only be two chapters long. |
|
05-27-2008, 07:43 AM | #16 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2008, 07:53 AM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
|
05-27-2008, 07:54 AM | #18 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 197
|
One common metaphorical interpretation is that "good and evil" is a euphemism for "everything", as in "all knowledge". As God's pets, they had access to the tree of life which gave them immortality, but if they also partook of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they would essentially be gods, having both all knowledge and eternal life. So god was basically holding out on them, until the serpent clues them in. At that point, god "kills them" or more precisely, condemns them to mortality by denying them access to the tree of life with the cherubs (monstrous lion-birds, not chubby baby angels) and flaming swords.
The blame on the "dual conspiracy" falls on the serpent and the woman, both of these are fertility/earth symbols representing the naturalistic religion (a la Asherah). On the other side you have patriarchal YHWH/Adam relationship which we are being told we should be following. So part of the lesson here is that "back in the good old days" everything was great until the WOMAN went wayward and went against YHWH and followed the advice of a symbol of the "old ways". |
05-27-2008, 08:11 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
|
|
05-27-2008, 08:40 AM | #20 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
|
Quote:
In that purpose, why would the author bother with clarifying death since everyone reading it is quite familiar with what happens to people when they get old. I think the answer to your question lies in what would have the tree meant to the original audience. The theme of trees and rivers in Genesis is interesting (IMO) because of what they would have symobilized to people that wander around in the desert for a generation. The theme of trees and rivers (and their meanings) are restored in the book of revelation (21 or so). I imagine that you did not really care about all that, but I think it is much more interesting than the meanings of the word for "day". What was intended to be communicated was communicated plenty. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|