FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2005, 07:32 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakejonesiv
Why do you regard my response inapproproate to these three questions? Am I missing something?

Jake Jones
Your questions pertain to the legitimacy of "Brother of the Lord" as a special title for James. I haven't said it couldn't be (haven't said it is either). I've simply addressed the OPs question about whether or not it is going too far to suggest that the term "brother of the Lord" referred to one that does God's will. I see no reason to presume that Paul thought it such. What I haven't done, and what your questions imply I have, is offered any suggestion as to what it does mean.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 02:35 AM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 3,827
Default

Jesus had a biological brother because mary gave birth her hymen busted and is not a virgin anymore(sorry they dont grow back).She had sex with her husband joseph.She was only human.or was she?I got it she was an alien.
proudliberal is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.