FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2008, 08:35 AM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
What historical evidence is there that the Tyre prophecy was made before the events? The correct answer is, none at all.
Your side is arguing both sides of the issue, you claim that the prophecy was written after the destruction of Tyre and your buddies claim that the prophecy is innacurate. Why would the prophecy be inaccurate if it was written after the event? Well, er, uh. . .
All that Johnny is saying here is that we can only guess when the book was written.

In fact, the evidence indicates that the book was STARTED before Nebby's attack (or at least before the outcome was known, because of its false prophecy of his victory), but was not COMPLETED until AFTER Nebby's failure (because of its admission that Nebby failed to plunder Tyre)... but prior to the expedition against Egypt (again, we can only surmise this because of the subsequent failure of that prophecy).

The only part of the "prophecy" that was successful was the claim that Nebby would attack Tyre. We don't know when THIS was written, and it could well have been after the siege started: making this a non-prophecy.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 08:39 AM   #72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
What historical evidence is there that the Tyre prophecy was made before the events? The correct answer is, none at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
Your side is arguing both sides of the issue, you claim that the prophecy was written after the destruction of Tyre and your buddies claim that the prophecy is innacurate. Why would the prophecy be inaccurate if it was written after the event? Well, er, uh.......
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
Great question! I wonder how they will respond now.
I already did as follows:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
What historical evidence is there that the Tyre prophecy was made before the events? The correct answer is, none at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
Your side is arguing both sides of the issue, you claim that the prophecy was written after the destruction of Tyre and your buddies claim that the prophecy is innacurate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnySkeptic
That is correct. Just as Christians sometimes use different arguments, skeptics sometimes use different arguments. The reason why I do not debate whether or not the prophecy is accurate is because that needlessly results in long debates that never reach a resolution. If the Tyre prophecy was written after the events, it doesn't matter whether or not it is accurate. The same goes for all other prophecies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
Why would the prophecy be inaccurate if it was written after the event?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnySkeptic
But I am not arguing that the prophecy is inacccurate. If the Tyre prophecy was written after the events, then obviously it was not a prophecy. Logically, the first step regarding debating a prophecy is reasonably establishing that it was made before the events.
Well, er, uh.......

Do all Republicans have similar postitions regarding the war in Iraq? No. Do all conservative Christians believe that the Bible is inerrant? No. Has James Holding criticized Josh McDowell on a number of occasions. Yes. Has there ever been a consistent set of Christians beliefs? No. First Corinthians 1:10-13 say "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?"

Well, er, uh.......
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 08:40 AM   #73
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
note the emphasis on "he appears to have substained an attack" does not mean he did. Egypt was defeated by Babylon. Common sense should tell you that had not Babylon defeated Egypt, it would not have been a world empire. Egypt was a superpower after all.
No, Egypt was NOT defeated by Babylon (not then: it had already lost territory in the Battle of Carchemish, but that was before Nebby attacked Tyre).

The Babylonian empire did NOT include Egypt.

Learn some history!

The prophecy failed.
I will create a thread on this. But for now the Tyre prohecy.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 08:41 AM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo
The Dead Sea Scrolls have absolutely proved that Daniel wrote about Greece/Alexander the Great two hundred years before these events happened.
Is that by any chance part of your next fantasy novel? Do you have any evidence that backs that up? No?, well I didn't think that you did.

The book of Daniel is fraudulent. Here is proof, and using Josh McDowell's OWN sources.

http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...tz/critic.html
Is it fraudulent because it is completely accurate because it was written after the destruction of Tyre or because it has historical errors?:wave:
arnoldo is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:01 AM   #75
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

You see ladies and gents supportes and crits. The island city of Tyre did not become a major city until Hiram combined two small islands and built temples and the royal palace on this site in the 10th century. It was not a fortress city during these days. In the book of Joshua Fortified Tyre is clearly located on the coast along with the coastal city of Ramah. When Hiram constructed the island city Old Tyre still remained on the mainland, it is the Mother city. This is the city which Nebby attacked and conquered. This is the city Ezekiel predicted would be attacked by Nebby. Because all the weapons mentioned by Ezekiel are land based weapons and useless at sea (unless ofcourse his horses could run on water). The prophecy is 100% accurate which proves....the existence of God
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:02 AM   #76
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
I will create a thread on this. But for now the Tyre prophecy.
Yes, please tell that to arnoldo. He continues to make off-topic posts. If the Tyre prophecy cannot stand upon its own merits, then it cannot stand at all. If you have evidence that the Tyre prophecy can stand upon its own merits, please post it. If not, then please start a thread on a prophecy that you believe can stand upon its own merits.

Of course, there is little need to debate Bible prophecy since it is a given that if a God exists, he does not care whether or not people believe that he can predict the future. If he did, he would have told Ezekiel about Alexander, and he could have told Ezekiel when Alexander would be born.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:05 AM   #77
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
You see ladies and gents supportes and crits. The island city of Tyre did not become a major city until Hiram combined two small islands and built temples and the royal palace on this site in the 10th century. It was not a fortress city during these days. In the book of Joshua Fortified Tyre is clearly located on the coast along with the coastal city of Ramah. When Hiram constructed the island city Old Tyre still remained on the mainland, it is the Mother city. This is the city which Nebby attacked and conquered. This is the city Ezekiel predicted would be attacked by Nebby. Because all the weapons mentioned by Ezekiel are land based weapons and useless at sea (unless ofcourse his horses could run on water). The prophecy is 100% accurate which proves....the existence of God
But since you have not reasonably proven that the Tyre prophecy was made before the events, the accuracy of the prophecy is irrelevant. What you need to do is start a new thread about a prophecy that has been fulfilled that everyone agrees was made before the events.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:10 AM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
Because all the weapons mentioned by Ezekiel are land based weapons and useless at sea (unless ofcourse his horses could run on water).
There was no reason to suppose that Ezekiel knew much about warfare, and it is evident that Ezekiel wasn't a "prophet" either (as the subsequent failure of both his prophecies demonstrates).

So how is Ezekiel's inaccuracy and general cluelessness an argument?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:19 AM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
In the book of Joshua Fortified Tyre is clearly located on the coast along with the coastal city of Ramah.
No it isn't. "Fortified Tyre" is the island fortress (with its 150-feet-high walls).

When do you imagine the Book of Joshua was written?

From here:
Quote:
Walter E. Rast writes: "New ground was broken in the literary study of Joshua when the German scholar Martin Noth proposed that the book of Joshua was part of a large historical work from Deuteronomy through 2 Kings. Noth termed this work the 'Deuteronomic History,' since he held that its point of view was often identical with that of the book of Deuteronomy. According to a widely accepted interpretation, Deuteronomy was the product of a movement in the latter third of the seventh century B.C...

...According to most scholars, the Deuteronomistic History was produced by several historians either around the time of Josiah's reform in Judah in the late seventh century B.C. or during the Exile, after 587 B.C." (Harper's Bible Commentary, p. 235)
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:23 AM   #80
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman
In the book of Joshua Fortified Tyre is clearly located on the coast along with the coastal city of Ramah.
No it isn't. "Fortified Tyre" is the island fortress (with its 150-feet-high walls).

When do you imagine the Book of Joshua was written?

From here:
Quote:
Walter E. Rast writes: "New ground was broken in the literary study of Joshua when the German scholar Martin Noth proposed that the book of Joshua was part of a large historical work from Deuteronomy through 2 Kings. Noth termed this work the 'Deuteronomic History,' since he held that its point of view was often identical with that of the book of Deuteronomy. According to a widely accepted interpretation, Deuteronomy was the product of a movement in the latter third of the seventh century B.C...

...According to most scholars, the Deuteronomistic History was produced by several historians either around the time of Josiah's reform in Judah in the late seventh century B.C. or during the Exile, after 587 B.C." (Harper's Bible Commentary, p. 235)
So are you saying that the island fortress existed before Hiram?
sugarhitman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.