Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-19-2005, 12:55 AM | #51 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Transylvania (a real place in Romania ) and France
Posts: 2,914
|
I have a small question about the dating of the Gospels:
How was the date of the manuscripts established? Did they carbon date the manuscripts? If so, how do they know the manuscripts are the original ones? |
06-19-2005, 03:14 AM | #52 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
|
|
06-19-2005, 08:59 AM | #53 | |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
Once we've established a definite range, we can use various other internal and external clues to narrow it further. |
|
06-20-2005, 12:37 AM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Transylvania (a real place in Romania ) and France
Posts: 2,914
|
Quote:
|
|
06-20-2005, 07:53 AM | #55 |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Yes, the really hardcore fundies still try to argue for traditional authorship and much earlier dates. It's important to them to believe that the Gospels reflect eyewitness accounts and apostolic authorship, so their a priori beliefs prevent them from being able to accept the very strong evidence for anonymity and late dates of authorship at face value. The arguments for traditional authorship are largely based on uncritical acceptance of dubious patristic tradition and tendentious apologies for the real evidence. As with creationism, they are using arguments from faith rather than any sort of methodical scholarship.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|