FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-31-2008, 11:57 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
I wonder why this 'oral tradition', words from Jesus himself, never seemed to make it into the Gospels.
Not quite sure I understand you, but the Gospels don't present any words spoken from Jesus to Paul.

Stephen
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:00 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post

So I was right; you do think the ancients were mostly insane.

Ben.
Do you prefer the term 'suffering from a delusion'?
No, I already told you what I prefer. I prefer a nuanced and balanced approach to studying the ancients, with their interpretive grids squarely in mind as we study them.

Quote:
After all, you claim most Jews thought Satan caused infirmities.
I said many if not most.

Quote:
Nowayadays, if somebody claims Jesus is passing them messages, we tend to ignore them.
1. Not all tend to ignore such people.
2. Our interpretive grid is different. (When I catch a very real sickness, I interpret it according to the standards of my day; when Paul caught a very real malady of some kind, which he metaphorically characterized as a thorn in the flesh, he interpreted it according to the standards of his day.)

Quote:
But if somebody of 2000 years ago came up with a saying of the Lord, scholars try to find the Sitz-im-Leben of the saying.
Well, of course they do, if they suspect on other grounds (such as synoptic witness) that the saying in Paul came from an HJ. Many scholars think that Paul is not claiming the saying in 1 Thessalonians 4, for example, as a saying from the HJ, but rather as a saying from the risen Lord. Those scholars do not look for an historical situation in Galilee for the saying. The scholars who think this saying is a variant of the synoptic apocalyptic discourse, OTOH, do often look for an historical situation in Galilee.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:01 PM   #33
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

How productive is this thread? Stephen Carr is trying to get intelligent Christians to explain the basis of their religious beliefs, if the people who wrote their sacred texts would be classed as insane in modern times.

Is this an unfair question? If so, why?
Toto is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:04 PM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
...

No, I already told you what I prefer. I prefer a nuanced and balanced approach to studying the ancients, with their interpretive grids squarely in mind as we study them.

...
But taking this interpretive grid into account, one must surely discount the truth value of what they wrote, or its relevance to our time, right?
Toto is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:06 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Or am I being too modern in my reading? Is there some standard (or non-standard) interpretation of this passage?
Not that I'm aware of. Lots of proposals, though.

Stephen
I have seen lots as well.

Do any say Paul thought he was being tormented by a real angel from Satan?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:08 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
How productive is this thread? Stephen Carr is trying to get intelligent Christians to explain the basis of their religious beliefs, if the people who wrote their sacred texts would be classed as insane in modern times.

Is this an unfair question? If so, why?
Not all of them would be classed as insane surely?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:19 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
...

No, I already told you what I prefer. I prefer a nuanced and balanced approach to studying the ancients, with their interpretive grids squarely in mind as we study them.

...
But taking this interpretive grid into account, one must surely discount the truth value of what they wrote, or its relevance to our time, right?
Discount? Probably too strong a word. Relativize? Of course!

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:21 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
How productive is this thread? Stephen Carr is trying to get intelligent Christians to explain the basis of their religious beliefs, if the people who wrote their sacred texts would be classed as insane in modern times.

Is this an unfair question? If so, why?
I must have missed the part where Steven clarified that he was mentally time-transporting these ancient people to modern times. AFAICS, he simply implied that they were insane, period.

He even said that sanity had hit the human race at some point, before which point I presume the human race was collectively insane.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:37 PM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Believing that Satan causes an illness might be a cultural value, or an honest mistake. But hearing voices directly from God - is that ever sane?

I guess that believing someone else who claims to hear voices from God could be a cultural value and not an indication of insanity. But surely it is not an indication of a well founded belief that we should respect?

Most of us have enough confidence in our modern values to say that the Afganistani policy of shutting down schools for girls and confining all women indoors, to the point where their health is affected by lack of sunlight, is based on a delusion. Do we have to give a pass to ancient cultures for some reason?

But in any case, why does anyone think they know what Paul was talking about here?

ETA - sometimes I am convinced that the human race IS collectively insane.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-31-2008, 12:45 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Most of us have enough confidence in our modern values to say that the Afganistani policy of shutting down schools for girls and confining all women indoors, to the point where their health is affected by lack of sunlight, is based on a delusion. Do we have to give a pass to ancient cultures for some reason?
Give a pass to ancient cultures? They are no longer around to give a pass to. I think we should seek to understand ancient cultures on their own terms before jerking to inappropriate labels such as insane.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.