FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2006, 10:08 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djugashvillain
You say it is "ultimately unconvincing", which I agree with; however, not long ago you said that:
...
Are you saying it is not worth discussing?
No. I just don't like the way everyone is treating Bede's OP, which frankly makes a lot of sense. Sure, it's not a convincing argument, but it offers up some interesting points.

Quote:
Or that all speculation is equally correct, regardless of factual accuracy and reason? Because by saying that his position is ultimately unconvincing contradicts this.
No; there is one truth. It's just that in this case it is not identifyable.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 10:12 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr
I don't know if Americans believe that religion is a problem, but after the war, America made sure religion played a much smaller role in Japan.

I wonder why the USA did that.
I wouldn't know. Maybe we as a then-predominently Christian nation wanted to discourage pagan practices. Maybe the government believed Japan's religious beliefs were harmful to them or us. Or maybe it never happened at all, and you're mistaken about the whole thing.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 01-22-2006, 10:56 PM   #43
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

More specifically, the American occupation forced Japan to separate religion and government, and forced the emperor to renounce his claim to divinity in the Shinto religion.

There was no comparable attempt that I know of to reform the German churches that had supported Hitler or the fascist forces in Europe.

hatsoff - it is best not to speculate if you don't know.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 03:00 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On the wing, waiting for a kick
Posts: 2,558
Default

Netither atheists nor theists come out of such an argument as this without blood on their hands (no pun intended).
An earlier poster was talking of communism deaths, found this article
http://www.geocities.com/decommuniza.../Communism.htm.

One thing puzzles me though. If atheism was such an important part of communist thought (since materialism was the basic doctrine) pace Marx, Lenin, Mao etc: then why is it disowned?
Tigers! is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 04:13 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,549
Default

Atheism is nothing more than the opinion that god or gods do not exist. To connect atheism with killing people is fallacious . Therefore though atheists may kill lots and lots of people, they cannot do so because they are atheists. People who believe in the heliocentric system of planetary motion killed more people than the atheists or the christians, probably about the same number as those killed by the atheists and the christians put together. Believing in the heliocentric system is an existential matter: it is either true, false, or undecidable, just as atheism is either true, false or undecidable: neither beliefs have any moral implications.

johno
johno is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 05:17 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigers!
Netither atheists nor theists come out of such an argument as this without blood on their hands (no pun intended).
An earlier poster was talking of communism deaths, found this article
http://www.geocities.com/decommuniza.../Communism.htm.

One thing puzzles me though. If atheism was such an important part of communist thought (since materialism was the basic doctrine) pace Marx, Lenin, Mao etc: then why is it disowned?
That website is grossly out of date; at least as it applies to Soviet Russia, and I have no doubt that the rest of the figures are similarly exaggerated. The most recent source I have concerning the Soviet Union during its purging years is this:

Quote:
[It is impossible] to calculate how many cases in the ordinary justice system were in fact raised under Article 58 and punished by execution or imprisonment. The numbers who died in transit to camps, in overcrowded wagons, short of food and water, in sub-zero temperatures can only be hazarded. The full reckoning of the victims of Soviet repression is certainly larger than the figures ['Sentences and Cases brought to Trial by State Security 1930-53] show, though by hundreds of thousands rather than millions. Executions and camp deaths between them total 1,829,903; this figure should be treated as a minimum.

Richard Overy, The Dictators, p.194

In 1932 the crisis finally produced massive famine. In a vast swathe of population from Kazakhstan through the northern Caucasus to the Ukraine, as a consequence of excessive procurement levels, loss of manpower and horses, peasant demoralization and resistance, an estimated 4 - 5 million died of malnutrition and hunger induced disease in the winter of 1932/3.

ibid., p.42
Barely seven million deaths, and certainly under ten million--not even approaching the ridiculous figure of twenty million your website gives.
Djugashvillain is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 05:23 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
hatsoff - it is best not to speculate if you don't know.
That has been my point all along.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 05:49 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,281
Default

The key words here being 'if you don't know', and by the content of his post (correcting a factual mistake on your behalf), I think he meant 'if you don't know the facts', meaning that ignorant speculation is best left unsaid.
Djugashvillain is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 06:05 AM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatsoff
I'm not sure why you would think that. Christianity may have inflamed tensions to some unknown degree, but racism permeates Christian and non-Christian societies alike. I may be missing something, but I don't see why the Germans should not have been racist were they not Christian. Were they even predominantly Christian?
The problem is that Christians can find plenty of verses in the Bible that support anti-semitism. This allows them to feel that their hatred is pleasing to god and that tolerance would not be pleasing to god. Modern Christians have fortunately gotten a lot better in this area.

This has certainly not been true historically. Martin Luther who was highly respected by German Protestants was a major Jew hater. He even said something about how we are at fault for not killing them. Luther might well have approved of Hitler's "solution" to the Jewish problem.
Dargo is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 06:44 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djugashvillain
The key words here being 'if you don't know', and by the content of his post (correcting a factual mistake on your behalf), I think he meant 'if you don't know the facts', meaning that ignorant speculation is best left unsaid.
I didn't make any factual mistake. I admitted ignorance and Toto made a rude remark. My point remains: We often don't know what has happened; and when we do, we still often don't know why. That leaves us only to speculate.
hatsoff is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.