Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-22-2006, 10:08 PM | #41 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-22-2006, 10:12 PM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|
01-22-2006, 10:56 PM | #43 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
More specifically, the American occupation forced Japan to separate religion and government, and forced the emperor to renounce his claim to divinity in the Shinto religion.
There was no comparable attempt that I know of to reform the German churches that had supported Hitler or the fascist forces in Europe. hatsoff - it is best not to speculate if you don't know. |
01-23-2006, 03:00 AM | #44 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On the wing, waiting for a kick
Posts: 2,558
|
Netither atheists nor theists come out of such an argument as this without blood on their hands (no pun intended).
An earlier poster was talking of communism deaths, found this article http://www.geocities.com/decommuniza.../Communism.htm. One thing puzzles me though. If atheism was such an important part of communist thought (since materialism was the basic doctrine) pace Marx, Lenin, Mao etc: then why is it disowned? |
01-23-2006, 04:13 AM | #45 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,549
|
Atheism is nothing more than the opinion that god or gods do not exist. To connect atheism with killing people is fallacious . Therefore though atheists may kill lots and lots of people, they cannot do so because they are atheists. People who believe in the heliocentric system of planetary motion killed more people than the atheists or the christians, probably about the same number as those killed by the atheists and the christians put together. Believing in the heliocentric system is an existential matter: it is either true, false, or undecidable, just as atheism is either true, false or undecidable: neither beliefs have any moral implications.
johno |
01-23-2006, 05:17 AM | #46 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-23-2006, 05:23 AM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2006, 05:49 AM | #48 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,281
|
The key words here being 'if you don't know', and by the content of his post (correcting a factual mistake on your behalf), I think he meant 'if you don't know the facts', meaning that ignorant speculation is best left unsaid.
|
01-23-2006, 06:05 AM | #49 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
This has certainly not been true historically. Martin Luther who was highly respected by German Protestants was a major Jew hater. He even said something about how we are at fault for not killing them. Luther might well have approved of Hitler's "solution" to the Jewish problem. |
|
01-23-2006, 06:44 AM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|