Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-12-2008, 08:00 AM | #131 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
We atheists or pagans don't buy it. It is pure BS. The xtians on the other hand they would probably buy it. Very sad. |
|
01-12-2008, 08:01 AM | #132 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-12-2008, 08:17 AM | #133 | |||||||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Messge to sugarhitman: May I ask why you typically spend much more of your time proselytizing and quoting Scripture than you do directly replying to what skeptics say. This is the Internet Infidels Discussion Board. However, you seldom DISCUSS anything. You typically not talk WITH skeptics. You talk AT them. When people get together, they generally do not like to be with a person who likes to be heard, but who does not like to listen to what other people have to say. You are a rude and disrespectful person. You need an attitude adjustment. God has killed more people with parasites alone than all of wars in history, and you have the audacity to say that Christians have mistreated Jews.
If God's protection of the Jews has been conditional upon good behavior, what about Jewish babies who would have unfairly suffered many times during Jewish history because of the disobedience of their parents? That proves that God is evil. Another Scripture that proves that God is evil is Exodus 20:5, which says that God punished people for sins that their ancestor committed. Exodus 4:11 says that God makes people blind, deaf, and dumb. God refuses to protect women from rapists. God sent Hurricane Katrina to New Orleans. There is not doubt whatsoever that the God of the Bible is the most dangerous being in the world. He even empowered a vicious Devil to help him terrorize mankind. No loving, rational God would indiscriminately kill people and innocent animals with hurricanes. Indiscriminately killing is good evidence of evil, amorality, or mental incompetence. Quote:
Quote:
You believe that God's protection of the Jews was conditional upon good behavior. You also believe that Pharoah enslaved the Jews. You also criticized Pharoah for mistreating the Jews. Why did you choose to embarrass yourself by saying that? If Pharoah mistrated the Jews, it was obviously THEIR fault for not obeying God. Otherwise, God would have allowed Pharoah to enslave the Jews. Isn't that right? You have another blunder to deal with. You believe that God's protection of Jews has been dependent upon good behavior. you criticized Pharoah for mistreating the Jews. You embarrassed yourself since you believe that God's protection of the Jews was conditional upon good behavior. If the Jews had acted right, God would not have allowed Pharoah to enslave them. If Pharoah enslaved them, it was their own fault. Not only that, but what about Jewish babies who would have unfairly suffered many times during Jewish history because of the disobedience of their parents? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour...he_declaration Quote:
At any rate, what evidence do you have that God had anything to do with the failed restoration of Israel in 1948? Quote:
|
|||||||
01-12-2008, 08:22 AM | #134 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2008, 08:25 AM | #135 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Message to sugarhitman: Since God told a lie when he promised to give Egypt to Nebuchadzzar, why do you support the Bible?
|
01-12-2008, 09:30 AM | #136 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Message to sugarhitman: Your apparent interest in evidence is obviously a masquerade. If the Bible said that God will send everyone to hell, you would reject the very same quality of evidence that you accept now. I would not accept the Bible even if it said that God will send everyone to heaven, although I would hope that he would. I would oppose the Bible for the same reasons that I oppose it now. Some of my reasons are as follows:
1 - The Gospel writers were anonymous. 2 - The Gospel writers almost never revealed who their sources were. 3 - The Gospel writers almost never claimed that they witnessed miracles. 4 - The Gospel writers almost never revealed who their sources were. 5 - Matthew and Luke borrowed a good deal from John. 6 - It impossible to be reasonably certain how many people saw Jesus after he supposedly rose from the dead. 7 - Today, millions of Christians disagree as to what constitutes a miracle healing. There are not any good reasons for anyone to assume that it was any different back then. 8 - I would still question why God injures and kills people and innocent animals with hurricanes. Unlike you, it is not my position that doing some good things justifies injuring and killing people and innocent animals, or setting up circumstances that cause people and innocent animals to be killed. 9 - I would still question God's desire to send skeptics to hell for eternity without parole. 10 - As much as I would like to rubber stamp everything that God does in order to go to heaven, my morals are not up for negotiation, and I am not able to do anything about that. The only possible solution for me would be if God explained to my satisfaction why he does what he does. It is my position that a loving God, a God who I would admire and accept, would provide me with explanations for his behavior before I made up my mind whether to accept him or reject him, especially if spending eternity in heaven and hell were at stake. So there you have it. While my beliefs would be consistent no matter what the Bible promised, you will only accept promises that you believe will ultimately benefit you. You have replaced logic and reason with emotional perceived self-interests. |
01-12-2008, 10:19 AM | #137 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2008, 11:25 AM | #138 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
|
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2008, 11:39 AM | #139 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Message to sugarhitman: Your anger, resentment, and hostility shows that you are not a Christian. The second greatest commandment is that people should love their fellow humans as they love themselves. 1st Corinthians 13 says that love is patient and kind, and keeps no record of wrongs. Jesus told his followers to do good to those who mistreated them.
No skeptic ever becomes a Christian based upon threats. That is one reason why Pascal's Wager is fraudulent. Jesus told the disciples to spread the Gospel. The word "Gospel" means "good news." You have not offered any good news, only threats. You have made a mockery out of the Gospel message. If the God of the Bible exists, you have put your salvation at risk with your hateful, vicious behavior. Consider the following Scriptures: Revelation 2:2-5 "I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars: And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name's sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted. Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent." Have you lost your first love, or did you ever have it? Are you not aware that many skeptics are loving, kind, wonderful, forgiving people? Many skeptics keep some of the Ten Commandments better than some Christians do. Some skeptic police officers would be willing to risk their lives in order to save your life. Many skeptics join the Corps, and do volunteer work, including working for free in soup kitchens. How you do expect people who have never heard of the God of the Bible to accept him? Millions of people died without hearing the Gospel message. Why was that? During Old Testament times, the vast majority of people in the world had not knowledge of the specific existence of the God of the Bible. Why was that? You need an attitude adjustment. If you do not get one, I predict that your threads will be transferred to another forum, or that you will be banned. This forum is for discussions. You seldom discuss anything. You usually preach at people and threaten them, and typically do not reply to what people say. Why is that? |
01-13-2008, 07:44 AM | #140 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
|
Quote:
If you read carefully you would have learned that Hagee does not believe in preaching the Gospel to the Jews. Because he incorrectly believe they dont need it. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|