FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2011, 07:21 AM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge AB Canada
Posts: 445
Default The Society of Biblical Literature Meeting Fall out

Jacques Berlinerblau has written an op-ed piece for the Chronicle of Higher Education on the persistence of theological practice in the SBL. It is a pretty good little article.

I also had my rant on the subject on my blog:

As I indicated in an update at the end of my post, things may be taking a turn for the more positive in the SBL, but we will have to see what sort of changes are in the works when the SBL announces its new views of programming.
DrJim is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 10:10 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

So is the Bible like a fossilized dinosaur turd?

Recognizing, of course, that biologists make good use of fossilized dinosaur turds, and if the Bible could be compared to dinosaur poop, it would raise its value quite a bit.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-30-2011, 11:13 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge AB Canada
Posts: 445
Default

Yes, I have Turd the Good News.
Quote:
Now I fully get Zeba’s [Zeba Crook, whose turd reference it was] point, but since Bibles are continually reinvented as new artifacts by the faithful and their publishing industry, some bibles are not yet fossilized but are still kind of steamy, oozy, gushy turds.
DrJim is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:19 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
So is the Bible like a fossilized dinosaur turd?

Recognizing, of course, that biologists make good use of fossilized dinosaur turds, and if the Bible could be compared to dinosaur poop, it would raise its value quite a bit.
Quote:
So a question came from the floor: how would you analyse a fossilised turd? To which the answer was that you analyse the dinosaur that produced the turd and not the turd itself.

Other questions from the floor .....


Why cant the turd be dated?

When and where did it hit the fan?
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 06:02 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Ddn't he write an article several years ago in which he bemoaned the inability of atheists to get positions in Bib studies departments?
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 06:23 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

http://berkeley.academia.edu/RonHend...blical_Studies

hendel's farewell to the SBL
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:09 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
So ... he lumps fundamentalists with postmodernists (I presume this means holocaust deniers) and feminists (who redefine God so as to make her more approachable)? This guy has an axe to grind, and I am not sure it is really about the critical use of reason.

Has anyone read David laird Dungan's A History of the Synoptic Problem (or via: amazon.co.uk) (The Anchor Bible Reference Library, Doubleday, 1999)? He seems to be fascinated by some of the same things as Hendel, and in some ways equally self-serving.

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:55 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
... postmodernists (I presume this means holocaust deniers) ...
No, you should not assume that.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 05:11 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
... postmodernists (I presume this means holocaust deniers) ...
No, you should not assume that.
I presumed, not assumed. :innocent2: Postmodernism can be used and abused, just as rationalism can.

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:01 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Holocaust deniers are not postmodern. They are modernists who deny a historical fact and assert other facts. (Bringing up holocaust denial is getting very close to Godwin's Law.)

Postmodernists doubt the ability to actually determine facts. The author of that paper lumps together postmodernists, feminists, and eco-theologians as "the cultured despisers of reason."
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.