FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2008, 04:57 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat View Post

Other arguments are found in The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel
. They include historical presence (including as an independent entity), forced exile throughout which the hope to return was maintained, self-initiated beginning of return process - physical and cultural, international recognition, the Holocaust, Jewish participation in the struggle against the Nazis. Most of these points may lead to discussion that belongs in the political fora rather than BC&H.
All these points while mentioned are ultimately justified in the closing as helping the biblical dream of the redemption of Israel.

We appeal to the Jewish people throughout the Diaspora to rally round the Jews of Eretz-Israel in the tasks of immigration and upbuilding and to stand by them in the great struggle for the realization of the age-old dream - the redemption of Israel.

Mind you as it is a political document they might just be pulling out all stops. I mean why not enlist fundamentalist jews and christians to help them by insinuating they will be doing the work of the almighty by establishing an Israeli/jewish state.
judge is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 05:20 AM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtwof View Post
I am embarrassed that I am not better educated on this topic but hey, I am seeking to educate myself now.

Is Israel's claim to the 'holy land' based only on biblical promises? I have heard that it is, but I have also heard that the Israelites had a historically valid claim to the land before the Palestinians. So, taking only secular history into account, who was there first?

Is-ra-el is a state of mind when the two rivers of life merge into one and become the Eu-phrates (bright-mind). This is about the time that all claims to the world are abandonned and so the worst thing that can happen is to have a physical peace of desert replace this lofty ideal.
Chili is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 05:24 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Posts: 272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat View Post
judge, converts into Judaism are considered adoptees. Their biological heritage doesn't matter, at least from a Jewish POV.
Yes I understand. So why should someone who converts to the jewish religion have a claim to own part of Palestine?

So the OP asks who was there first? Certainly no jew alive today can prove that he is a descendent of the biblical jews, so no jew alive today can claim to have been there first.
Someone who converts to Judaism is not automatically an Israeli national.
ernestombayo is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 06:10 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mind the time rift, cardiff, wales
Posts: 645
Default

I have come across a number of European studies of genetics and related sciences that reveal many modern inhabitants are direct descendants of ancient Europeans. Following the destruction of Judea in 135 c.e. the Jewish nation came to an end but people continued to live there. There are folk movements everywhere but in essence the Palestinians are the descendants of the Jewish nation it just so happens they speak the language and practise the religion of invaders.

Unfortunately most of the Middle-East was carved up by the politics of France and Britain after the destruction of the Ottoman empire. what happened can not be reversed, people need a home but hearing a fundy literally scream that god promised the land to them 5,000 years ago and having seen policeing that looks like occupation I wish things would just move on for the betterment of all.
jules? is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 06:21 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default What percentage did leave in the diaspora?

Given that this is a historical forum, here is a question that a historian may be able to answer. Once the diaspora after the second Jewish war had more or less completed, what percentage of the original population had left? Compare this with the estimate that during the Babylonian exile, the amount of people exiled is estimated (I think) at something like 10-15%. If the amount of people who left Palestine after the two Jewish wars is comparable to that, any historical "we are the legitimate descendants" claim is very weak. A priori I would think that only the most religious types would have left, and that that was a relatively small fraction. But I could easily be wrong, of course.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 07:00 AM   #16
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

Eventually Israel is going to become de-racinated/ethnicized and will no longer be significantly Jewish in my opinion. But a similar fate will befall the Palestinians as well. The religions and cultural boundaries which are fuelling this war will cease to be important. Transnational forces will start to be more important than these troublesome notions of nation-statehood.
premjan is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 08:01 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 430
Default

Wouldn't the biblical "land grant" also have to acknowledge the later dispersion in the first century as a divine mandate to be followed?

Seems to me that the political justifications are far more compelling and workable.

But then again, when you can twist around a text or a tradition to imply almost anything you wish it to, well, I guess that has always been an issue with civilization.
Casper is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 08:51 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mg01 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtwof View Post
Is Israel's claim to the 'holy land' based only on biblical promises? I have heard that it is, but I have also heard that the Israelites had a historically valid claim to the land before the Palestinians. So, taking only secular history into account, who was there first?
The long and the short of it, apparently the earliest Israelites, where Canaanites.
As there does not seem to be an ethnic group claiming to be the Canaanites filing a counter claim, then the Israelis win by default, I guess?

Now, if this were merely a religious contention wouldn’t Native Americans of the Mormon faith also be able to claim the right to return to Israel? Mormon faith believes they are a lost tribe of Israel after all.
Newfie is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 10:44 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge
Yes I understand. So why should someone who converts to the jewish religion have a claim to own part of Palestine?
The way an adopted child has a share in the inheritance of their adoptive parents. Halakhically all male converts are sons of Abraham, can't remember the formal Halakhic parentage of female converts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper
Wouldn't the biblical "land grant" also have to acknowledge the later dispersion in the first century as a divine mandate to be followed?
Since the late 1st century CE the mainstream Jewish position is that God no longer reveals his mandates. The only acceptable way to discern what he commands Jews to do is via interpretation of Torah by the majority of the sages of each generation. (Conservative Jews differ with Orthodox on whom they recognise as sages and how literally to read the text, Reform Judaism lets anyone interpret the text for themselves.)

To all: BTW the reference to The Almighty isn't the most accurate translation of the Hebrew. Ben-Gurion tried to compromise between the religious Zionists who wanted a very explicit religious reference and the socialist Zionists who didn't want any and used the term 'Tsur Yissrael' ie 'the rock of Israel', letting anyone interpret it hir favorite way.
Anat is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 12:27 PM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat View Post
Since the late 1st century CE the mainstream Jewish position is that God no longer reveals his mandates. The only acceptable way to discern what he commands Jews to do is via interpretation of Torah by the majority of the sages of each generation. (Conservative Jews differ with Orthodox on whom they recognise as sages and how literally to read the text, Reform Judaism lets anyone interpret the text for themselves.)
Thanks for the reply. In keeping within the forum scope though, is there anything specifically biblical, especially from a Christian standpoint, that supports this view?

I know, there is the apocolyptic approach, but that is fairly laden with semantics. Maybe that is about all there is?
Casper is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.