FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2006, 07:24 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by everettf
The book is fiction. Why do people think it's a fact?
No one is claiming that there is a real globe-trotting Harvard symbology professor who uncovered an ancient Biblical cover-up with the help of a French cop. But non-fantasy fiction often incorporates real or plausible elements.

Brown is on record as saying that the alternate Jesus timeline is based on real scholarship, and it is - the aforementioned Holy Blood, Holy Grail. It is my understanding, however, that the balance of evidence points to the Priory of Sion registry being a mid-20th century forgery.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 07:26 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: By Lake Ontario.
Posts: 5,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by everettf
The book is fiction. Why do people think it's a fact?
Which, The Da Vinci Code or the Bible?
My money's on both.
Matty is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 07:27 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 6,610
Default

I enjoyed the DaVinci Code as fiction. As for Holy Blood, Holy Grail, I tossed the book across the room when the authors insinuated that the notoriously fraudulent Protocols of the Elders of Zion might be based on some kind of fact. Bah.
Garnet is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 07:54 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Land of the Baptist Church
Posts: 76
Default

I'm told it was almost expected that Rabbi's of the time would be married, and if JC wasn't, that would be noteworthy. Perhaps JC was Gay?
:devil:
striderlives is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:45 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 5,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D2_Supreme
For those of you who have read it or have heard enough about it to know its underlying theme---that Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ were lovers--what do you think?
The book is explicitly a work of fiction. What am I supposed to think? I haven't read the book, so I'm unable to offer any literary criticism. But the only applicable criticism to a work of fiction is literary.
PoodleLovinPessimist is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:49 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: orange county,ca
Posts: 630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty
Which, The Da Vinci Code or the Bible?
My money's on both.
You are so right
everettf is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 10:03 AM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 74
Default

When I read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" I remember thinking it would make a great basis for a fiction novel - guess I should have tried it!

People being upset about Jesus possibly having a wife/lover isn't that shocking, in Catholic school we were taught about Mary "ever virgin". Yes, that's right, apparantly there is a whole group of people who believe, even though she was married, Mary never had sex.
Tulipa is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 10:29 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulipa
People being upset about Jesus possibly having a wife/lover isn't that shocking, in Catholic school we were taught about Mary "ever virgin". Yes, that's right, apparantly there is a whole group of people who believe, even though she was married, Mary never had sex.
In fact, it is Catholic dogma that Mary lived a sinless life - the Immaculate Conception.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 10:40 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: china
Posts: 547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philosoft
In fact, it is Catholic dogma that Mary lived a sinless life - the Immaculate Conception.
Wait a minute, are we are not talking two Mary's here? Mary mother of Jesus and Mary of Magdalena..the famous slut (also referred to as Mary the blower, by Paul). Or do I need a refresher course on NT?
mindovermyth is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 11:29 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mindovermyth
Wait a minute, are we are not talking two Mary's here? Mary mother of Jesus and Mary of Magdalena..the famous slut (also referred to as Mary the blower, by Paul). Or do I need a refresher course on NT?
I don't think the "virgin" to whom Tulipa was referring is supposed to be Mary Magdalene.
Philosoft is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.