Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Sheshonq · 04-05-2008, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarhitman

Sheshong has exit the building folks.

Nope. It's just don't have to prove your argument wrong.

You need to prove your argument *right*.

Sheshonq · 04-05-2008, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarhitman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheshonq

You're the one who is claiming that the HRE is the successor to the Roman Empire. That's your claim, and your burden of proof.

You have presented no sources to support that claim; probably because it's bullshit to begin with.

What source you have to disprove it? Show to us the readers, that you have it. And dont get mad at me because you have none that seperates the Europeans from Rome.

Continuous attempts to shift the burden of proof will not work. He who claims, has burden of proof. And he who claims first, has first burden of proof.

So get busy.

Sheshonq · 04-05-2008, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarhitman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheshonq

Sorry; the rules of evidence don't change just because you're too lazy to do the homework. You made a claim for fulfilled prophecy and Israel being a nation during Roman times.

Your claim, your burden of proof. So get off your ass and prove it.

HE, he, you have no source....which is why you have resorted to this. If anyone can prove that Israel was not a nation during Rome bring forth your source. (Most of you will not even try this one, because you are smarter than some like....) :wave:

Continuous attempts to shift the burden of proof will not work. He who claims, has burden of proof. And he who claims first, has first burden of proof.

So get busy.

sugarhitman · 04-05-2008, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheshonq

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarhitman

HE, he, you have no source....which is why you have resorted to this. If anyone can prove that Israel was not a nation during Rome bring forth your source. (Most of you will not even try this one, because you are smarter than some like....) :wave:

Continuous attempts to shift the burden of proof will not work. He who claims, has burden of proof. And he who claims first, has first burden of proof.

So get busy.

And he who claims that another claims is false must show evidence....so give us your source (other than your self).

Question do you have a source or not? :wave:

Sheshonq · 04-05-2008, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarhitman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheshonq

Continuous attempts to shift the burden of proof will not work. He who claims, has burden of proof. And he who claims first, has first burden of proof.

So get busy.

And he who claims that another claims is false must show evidence....so give us your source (other than your self).

However, your claim came first.
Therefore your burden of proof is first.

If (and when) you get off your lazy ass and prove your claim, then at that time -- and only then -- will you be in a position to demand proof from me.

Ah. Typical fundies. They run around shooting off their mouths about topics they are ignorant of. And then they proclaim, "I'm wrong, unless someone proves me wrong." Unfortunately for fundies, it doesn't work that way.

:rolling::rolling::rolling::rolling::rolling::roll ing::rolling:

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.