FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2005, 06:58 AM   #281
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: WHERE GOD IS NOT!!!!!
Posts: 4,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lee_merrill
But you didn't answer my yes or no question, I wasn't asking for you to answer your yes or no question. My question was phrased so as to contain an implicit endorsement of my view, no matter whether you say yes or no...

My phone line is out, it was thundering and lightening today, and so it may be a couple of days before I can reply to all the points being made and further questions being raised...

Regards,
Lee
No I don't agree that God's prerogative to butcher children like goats was just. I've given you God's existence and prerogative all along. You still haven't established the justice.

Now let's talk about the prerogative. I created children. Do I have the prerogative to kill them? Can you explain how God as the creator has the prerogative?
BadBadBad is offline  
Old 06-08-2005, 07:21 AM   #282
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: christchurch new zealand
Posts: 99
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by lee_merrill

No, I'm not saying people don't feel pain.

If even pain can bring a good result, that could come in no other way, is this an incomprehensible position?

Do we not admire people who overcame evil, though it cost them in the process? Even because there was a cost involved? Overcoming evil without any pain or difficulty would indeed not be admirable.

And if there was essentially nothing to overcome, what would there be to reward?

Regards,
Lee
Just a minute - let's take this back a step.

The title of this thread is 'was moses a baby killer?', therefore we are talking here about specific incidences mentioned in the bible about MOSES having children (men and women too, but this is an aside) MURDERED, under the supposed direction of his god. Am I correct so far? :huh:

So, if my above statement is correct, then the pain inflicted on them came as a result of orders from Moses, who, in turn, was following orders from his god.

If all of these statments are correct then it follows - in my logic at least - that the 'evil' to be 'overcome' which cannot be 'admirable' without 'pain', ( I repeat - The EVIL!) comes from this god ???

So to summarize.....
I should believe in an evil god who kills babies for fun? :huh:

Thank you Lee Merrill, for enlightening me :notworthy :notworthy
Therese is offline  
Old 06-08-2005, 03:49 PM   #283
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 153
Default

This is at least the second time that lee has outright admitted that these actions were evil.

One wonders, now that he has said it twice, how he can also continue to deny it. It make sense though, he is getting his contradictory view from a book full of contradiction.

The longer I am here, everytime I tell someone I used to be a very devoted christian, I get more embarrased.
Gamut is offline  
Old 06-10-2005, 08:21 AM   #284
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamut
This is at least the second time that lee has outright admitted that these actions were evil.

One wonders, now that he has said it twice, how he can also continue to deny it. It make sense though, he is getting his contradictory view from a book full of contradiction.

The longer I am here, everytime I tell someone I used to be a very devoted christian, I get more embarrased.
If you look closely, it does seem that lee is groping his way out. Admitting to the contradiction was a baby-step forward.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 06-10-2005, 03:00 PM   #285
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldarion Lathria
The source is De Squalor Bibliam by Stephanus. It is also referred to in Gerson's Auferabilitate Ecclesia ad Papam It is entered into evidence at the trial of Yahweh for war crimes on Mount Olympus.

Eldarion Lathria
The Kami deities (Amaterasu et al.), Yahweh's collaborators druring World War II, will join him on the docket.
Enda80 is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 11:22 AM   #286
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,074
Default

Hi everyone,

Quote:
Badger3k: To recap, your question was: "Do you agree that this this particular exercise of God's prerogative to decide on the end of a person's life was just?"

My answer was no, I do not agree.
Well at least we agree now that God has that prerogative! Only I think we don't agree on that, but this was the point of phrasing this question this way, for then I could ask why God did not exercise his prerogative here appropriately, and proceed from there.

Quote:
BadBadBad: No I don't agree that God's prerogative to butcher children like goats was just.
But now this is phrasing the question to contain your view in it. This is what I was trying to point out, this is not a way to advance the discussion...

Quote:
BBB: Now let's talk about the prerogative. I created children. Do I have the prerogative to kill them? Can you explain how God as the creator has the prerogative?
Because he can see the outcome of any given event, to the end, even beyond death?

If a robber cuts me, and cuts out a tumor somehow, and God arranged this, knowing the result, for example. But we can't know the future like this, so we don't have this prerogative.

Quote:
You still haven't established the justice.
Isn't the motive, and the purpose, and the ultimate outcome, what is critical? That is my response.

Quote:
Therese: we are talking here about specific incidences mentioned in the bible about MOSES having children (men and women too, but this is an aside) MURDERED, under the supposed direction of his god.
That was the conclusion, I am contesting this description though, for example, by writing my own description of the details, we may all do this, and it does not, again, help us make any progress.

Quote:
Therese: then it follows - in my logic at least - that the 'evil' to be 'overcome' which cannot be 'admirable' without 'pain', ( I repeat - The EVIL!) comes from this god ???
This was an example of a pertinent principle though, and not an explanation of these events. I hold that the Canaanites were possibly into demonic interactions, and may have been quite extensively infected with this, giving supernatural abilities, and this judgment was a judgment, not an evil to be overcome.

Regards,
Lee
lee_merrill is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 11:37 AM   #287
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default

Quote:
This was an example of a pertinent principle though, and not an explanation of these events. I hold that the Canaanites were possibly into demonic interactions, and may have been quite extensively infected with this, giving supernatural abilities, and this judgment was a judgment, not an evil to be overcome.
And your evidence for this is...?

And don't bother with biblical claims about cannibalism or child sacrifice. The Romans did that smear campaign to the Christians when there were but a little cult. Real evidence. Archaeological, anthropological, solid evidence.
Avatar is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 02:27 PM   #288
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lee_merrill
This was an example of a pertinent principle though, and not an explanation of these events. I hold that the Canaanites were possibly into demonic interactions, and may have been quite extensively infected with this, giving supernatural abilities, and this judgment was a judgment, not an evil to be overcome.
And this justifies Moses having babies killed?

Let's go over that again. Moses ordered the killing of babies and even of the unborn. Was this because those innocents where somehow into demonic interactions?

Enlighten. please.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 05:10 PM   #289
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
And this justifies Moses having babies killed?

Let's go over that again. Moses ordered the killing of babies and even of the unborn. Was this because those innocents where somehow into demonic interactions?

Enlighten. please.
Gee, John...don't you know? They were the spawn of demons! Kill them!

Even though the text says nothing about this...we can guess to convince ourselves it's OK to kill them. :down:
Gamut is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 06:18 PM   #290
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamut
Gee, John...don't you know? They were the spawn of demons! Kill them!

Even though the text says nothing about this...we can guess to convince ourselves it's OK to kill them. :down:

I especially like the fact that the Christian theists who read that marvelous biblical passage will insist that a doctor who has performed an abortion has killed an "innocent unborn."
John A. Broussard is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.