FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2007, 03:04 PM   #141
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
What about the fish Jeffrey? Are you amenable enough at this stage
to cut Joe a little slack, and admit that there does not exist any
reasonable and objective historical evidence to associate the
phenomenom known as "christianity" with "the fish"?

Coinage and archeological relics, reliefs, etc representing "fish"
during the pre-nicene epoch in question, are rare. According to
Joe the "fish" only commence to appear with the Flavians, in the
numismatist chronology.
I have no idea what you are talking about.

What are "the fish" you speak of?

JG
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-18-2007, 03:13 PM   #142
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000 View Post
What are "the fish" you speak of?
fish symbol, and christianity

Results 1 - 100 of about 54,700 for christian "fish symbol". (0.22 seconds)

Elsewhere Joe has provided evidence to associate the appearance
of this "commonly conceived" fish symbolism to coins and archeological
relics associated with the Flavians, in the first century.

Before this, I had never seen a sure citation (outside of the literary
tradition) - ie: coins, inscriptions, etc - by which "christianity" and this
"fish symbolism" could be objectively related.
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-18-2007, 03:16 PM   #143
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
fish symbol, and christianity

Results 1 - 100 of about 54,700 for christian "fish symbol". (0.22 seconds)
This is entirely unhelpful. What are "the fish" that Joe is making claims about and are reputedly associated with Vespasian & Co.? In what texts are these reputed associations supposed to be made?

JG
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-18-2007, 03:20 PM   #144
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Hey Joe,

Can you post that reference to the coinage of the Flavians,
or provide that link to another discussion (at another board)
as I cannot locate the page here and now.
mountainman is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:34 PM   #145
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 11
Default

Personally, I think that the "bullying" that's been directed at Joe is the best endorsement of his book that I've heard so far. It makes me think that people are actually frightened that he might be on to something!
Alexp is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:49 PM   #146
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexp View Post
Personally, I think that the "bullying" that's been directed at Joe is the best endorsement of his book that I've heard so far. It makes me think that people are actually frightened that he might be on to something!
Yeah. That's it. We're frightened. OMG, a fellow who has no Latin and Greek is telling us what Latin and Greek texts say! Run for the hills!!!

Good grief.

Perhaps, since you think there is something in what Joe claims, you could show us "bullies" where the Greek and/or Latin words for "Christ" appears in any of the texts Joe says it does (i.e., Cassius Dio, Roman History 65.8.1, 66.1.4; Josephus, Jewish War 3.399-404 and 6.310-315; Suetonius, Life of Vespasian 4.5; Tacitus, Histories 5.13; Zonaras, Epitome 11.16) and where it is therein applied to, or said (or thought by Vespasian) to belong to Vespasian?

And while you are at it, perhaps you could explain why it is that, despite the fact that Joe keeps confidently asserting over and over again (see his recent round of this on the JM List -- where no one, including Earl D., is buying it) that the Greek and/or Latin term for "Christ" does appear in these texts and that it is therein applied to, or said (or thought by Vespasian/Flavians) to belong to Vespasian/Flavians, Joe keeps prescinding from showing through an analysis of the Greek and/or Latin of these texts that this is indeed the case, but instead only responds when asked to do so with "we're done".

From my perspective, it ain't us "bullies" who are frightened.

JG
jgibson000 is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:53 PM   #147
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexp View Post
Personally, I think that the "bullying" that's been directed at Joe is the best endorsement of his book that I've heard so far. It makes me think that people are actually frightened that he might be on to something!
If you wanna waste your money, by all means, that's your decision. I've seen people buy worse.

However, how in the world are we "bullying" Joe. A guy without credentials, or necessary training, for that matter, who plagiarizes online sites without credit, and then refuses to engage in dialogue because he won't share the details of his book?

If I'd known better, I'd consider you a sock-poppet of Joe. But alas, you too are probably just duped by something that sounds new and innovative, not realizing that if you would read the archives, we've been over this before. Joe plays his little game, and then when facing his accounting, he plays the martyr.

Pathetic.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:08 PM   #148
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000 View Post
Yeah. That's it. We're frightened. OMG, a fellow who has no Latin and Greek is telling us what Latin and Greek texts say! Run for the hills!!!

Good grief.

JG
Does sarcasm usually work for you or is this the type of the scholarship I should anticipate from this forum? If you have a rebuttal to Joe's thesis, state it -- clearly and with a little professionalism. The abuse and the obscenities I've read on this thread are tactics I'd expect from children who have run out of anything pertinent to say.

Do you have anything pertinent to contribute?

Because, in my opinion, your points are rendered moot by your emotional replies.
Alexp is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:15 PM   #149
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Alexp - I see you're new here. This thread has been going on for many months now, and during the first few posts there are links to yet other threads about Atwill and his theory. Read them first and them come back when you're done.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:35 PM   #150
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 1,831
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexp View Post
Does sarcasm usually work for you or is this the type of the scholarship I should anticipate from this forum? If you have a rebuttal to Joe's thesis, state it -- clearly and with a little professionalism. The abuse and the obscenities I've read on this thread are tactics I'd expect from children who have run out of anything pertinent to say.

Do you have anything pertinent to contribute?

Because, in my opinion, your points are rendered moot by your emotional replies.
Yeah, follow Chris' advice. You will find several rebuttals. Unless you are here to support Atwill...
Atwill's thesis is crap. The best example is the passover lamb happening in August, when Atwill cannot even understand that it is happening in August by reading Josephus. Atwill's thesis is an insult to intelligence and to the Jews.
Johann_Kaspar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.