FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2012, 06:26 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
not today. papa is reserved for the bishop of Alexandria
By people who watch cartoons.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 06:34 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Yes, I have phoned Jerome today and he has confirmed that Papa is reserved for the bishop of Alexandria.
Iskander is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 06:35 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Isn't it strange. When it comes to Bible scrutiny, free thought, the latest free thought, even wild thought, is most acceptable, even if rationality is scarce; while conventional wisdom, based on hundreds of years of tested scholarship, is ignored and even derided. When it comes to authoritarianism, the history of suppression of Christianity, even of killing people in the name of the Bible deity, free thought never gets a look in. Resort is made to dictionaries!
sotto voce is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 08:19 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

“The name patriarch was at first, particularly in the East, an honorary title for all bishops, and was not till the fourth century exclusively appropriated to the bishops of the three ecclesiastical and political capitals of the Roman Empire, Antioch, Alexandria and Rome, and also to the bishop of Jerusalem honoris causa, and the bishop of Constantinople or New Rome.

So in the West the term papa afterwards appropriated by the Roman bishop, as summus pontifex, vicarious Christi, was current for a long time in a more general application.”


History of the Christian Church
Philip Schaff
Iskander is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 09:03 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
“The name patriarch was at first, particularly in the East, an honorary title for all bishops, and was not till the fourth century exclusively appropriated to the bishops of the three ecclesiastical and political capitals of the Roman Empire, Antioch, Alexandria and Rome, and also to the bishop of Jerusalem honoris causa, and the bishop of Constantinople or New Rome.

So in the West the term papa afterwards appropriated by the Roman bishop, as summus pontifex, vicarious Christi, was current for a long time in a more general application.”


History of the Christian Church
Philip Schaff
No better than the dictionary.

Try free thought?
sotto voce is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 09:59 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

i haven't come across jerome calling any other bishop "pope" save for the bishop of rome (= pope damascus)
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:10 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I found an address to the bishop of Alexandria "Pope Theophilus" which is to be expected (as the title originated with the tradition of St Mark). http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3001114.htm But Salamis is not an important enough see. It's puzzling.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:11 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
i haven't come across jerome calling any other bishop "pope" save for the bishop of rome (= pope damascus)
It's of great importance to lick the right buttocks.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:12 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

In this letter the bishop of Jerusalem is simply called 'bishop' but Epiphanius is 'Pope':

Quote:
About two years ago the aforesaid Pope Epiphanius sent a letter to Bishop John, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3001057.htm
Surely the see of Jerusalem is more apostolic than Salamis.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:18 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Here's a typical Protestant from the nineteenth century trying to use this reference to 'Pope Epiphanius' to attack the Papacy in Rome. Yet the only examples he can find it seems for the use of 'Pope' as a title is (a) Rome (b) Alexandria) and (c) Cyprus. http://books.google.com/books?id=i8Y...ius%22&f=false

Yet this only proves that the use of the title with Epiphanius is an anomaly. Again, the title of Pope originated in Alexandria, it is first used with Heraclas at the beginning of the third century, it was taken over by the Romans at the turn of the fifth century. Something is definitely unusual about Jerome's appropriation of the title for Epiphanius.
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.