Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-25-2007, 06:56 AM | #11 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 440
|
|
01-25-2007, 08:12 AM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Political, not literary interest. The sons of Zadok are the leaders of the community. And there is another, more specific, marker: Ezekiel's calendar is (luni-)solar, which makes it as new as the modifications in the Enochic Astronomical Book, which institutes the extra four days to make the calendar that of the Dead Sea Scrolls, replacing the Persian 360-day calendar with a 364-day calendar. (There are other indicators as well.) What you were responding to was a passing comment, so it glided over much.
spin |
01-25-2007, 09:12 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
I don't see any problem with the pillars passage. If the earth is shaken, then its pillars (and other structures) will fall. It's not saying that the earth is held up by pillars.
|
01-25-2007, 01:00 PM | #14 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
You need to consider all of the passages which speak about the earth's pillars rather than putting a spin on one verse in isolation: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
01-25-2007, 01:27 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Perhaps the author of 1 Samuel believed the earth was set up on pillars, but from the passage it sounds to me like he was simply using imaginitive imagery to say that God is responsible for civilization. From where I sit, the other passages don't at all imply that pillars hold up the earth.
|
01-25-2007, 05:18 PM | #16 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|