Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-03-2005, 10:14 AM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Mark used Homer as a hypotext
Posted by Ted in Mark Chiasm thread.
Could someone explain what this means? And secondly, apart from Jesus Mystery stuff, what are the agreed relationships between Greek thinking, stories and gods etc and xianity? Did xianity kill off the gods and heroes? Have we in the West inherited a demythologised world view, so that science is the next step from many gods to one to none? (I know, depending where the discussion goes it might belong in GRD!) |
03-03-2005, 10:21 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
It means that Mark took Homeric structures and used his story on the top of that.
|
03-03-2005, 11:04 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
|
There seems to be a very good case for Mark to be derived from the Homeric epics as laid out in this book:
The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark I found his arguments to be fairly convincing but not 100% so. Julian |
03-03-2005, 12:06 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
|
I read the book, too, and also found it fairly convincing. The problem is that I also find convincing books (like "Gospel Fictions") that point out where Mark drew inspiration from the OT. At some point, though, it starts seeming like too much. I mean, just how self-consious can a writer be when putting together his own literary work?
|
03-03-2005, 12:14 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
The Amazon reviews got a response from J P Holding! Must be saying something right!
|
03-03-2005, 02:49 PM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
Vorkosigan |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|