Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-20-2007, 02:13 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,615
|
the fact is that if Jesus had lived in India, he would have blended in and would have simply been another "enlightened God-man", as such pacisifistic men claiming some divine attribute have existed in India for thousands of years.
Many aspects of Jesus is contrary to his native culture which was rather dogmatic and violent. What I personally believe is that Jesus traveled to India, learned a few tricks from the Buddhist and Hindu sages/mystics, and then traveled back to his homeland to incorporate what he learned in India and blend it with his local religion (which is why made such ridiculous statements that he is the *only* way to God/Heaven/whatever and the *only* truth as opposed to Krishna simply stating he was "the way"). Of course, Christians will deny this till death, but it is a fact of history and culture that pacifistic God men were a staple of Indian culture and the antithesis of near-eastern Semitic culture. Lets not also forget that the Jews ripped-off their monotheism from the Zoroastrians whos religion was a sister to Vedic Hinduism. The fact is that near-eastern religion has always been primitive in comparison to eastern thought, and many of the main concepts of Abrahamic religion were simply transmitted from either the Indians or Persians into the near-east, and then blended and mangled in with local religion. |
11-20-2007, 02:19 AM | #12 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
I don't think either Jesus or St. Thomas ever travelled to India. There were a lot of similar cults and philosophies among the Jews (e.g. the Essenes), and Jesus was just another preacher, whose story has been either faked or substantially embroidered to make it saleable within the Greco-Roman world. As for borrowing, there is some speculation that the Kalki Avatar has been borrowed from the book of Apocalypse in the bible.
|
11-20-2007, 02:31 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
|
11-20-2007, 03:05 AM | #14 | |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
Quote:
Sorry unable to find a better link than that, but there is no inherent reason for eschatology in Hinduism (wherein time is cyclic), so the fact that Kalki appears at the end of the ten-avatara cycle plus the fact that he rides a white horse does make him a bit like a rider of the apocalypse. |
|
11-20-2007, 03:48 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
|
Boy, he was busy1 Went to India and America? Maybe the connection between Indianns and Am. Indians is a divine one?
|
11-21-2007, 08:21 AM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
And did those feet...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_did...n_ancient_time (A rough guide to where he went?) |
11-21-2007, 10:55 PM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
till we have built Jerusalemeta: just as I posted the stereo poured forth with the 'Hallelujah Chorus' - there is a god afterall! |
|
11-22-2007, 03:10 AM | #19 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Apollonius of Tyana, Jesus and India
The relative ancient historical assessment between the
purported figures of Jesus and Apollonius of Tyana is stacked in the favour of the latter figure. The best intro may be: Apollonius of Tyana and His Historicity - Maria Dzielska. The biography of Apollonius by Philostratus c.220 CE describes Apollonius' journey to India, and return. About the chronology of christianity and Philostratus Maria Dzielska writes: Quote:
I of course would dispute this. Philostratus never mentions christianity. Because it had not yet been invented. The presumption that "Philostratus must have ... borrowed from the christian literature is ancient, and has its precedent with Eusebius of Caesarea who calumnified Apollonius in the fourth century. The Eusebian treatise was followed by persecution of temples and priests in the months before the military supremacy council of Nicaea. Our thesis implies that Philostratus and even Porphyryr, never knew "christianity" because the new and strange Roman religion was invented after they lived. Should Indian references to the visit of a western sage in the first century CE ever appear, the figure who has the most likely historicity of fulfilling such evidence, at the moment, with the evidence the way it is, is not the HJ. Best wishes, Pete Brown |
|
11-22-2007, 10:37 AM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|