Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-05-2004, 05:19 PM | #1 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Death Panel District 9
Posts: 20,921
|
Quote:
No matter what you call it it is the same overall type of garment that women wear, but made out of canvas. (I even wear my skirt to church and our cathedral dean wants one!) So isn't dress culturally and temporally determined? How do I know what God meant by women's clothes? www.utilikilts.com In otherwords, that law is silly because we have no reference point. |
|
11-05-2004, 07:06 PM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Are you saying "man" skirt" = "woman skirt" (and do women wear "man skirts" as well?)? How do you know? Do you not know what men normally wear as compared to what women normally wear? The following are examples:
|
|
11-05-2004, 07:08 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
|
Deleted reply to Inquistive's nonsense, as it is off-topic for the thread.
|
11-05-2004, 08:55 PM | #4 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This WHOLE discussion is about the Christians persecuting homosexuals by banning gay marriage, based on the Bible. We KNOW that Christians commit crime, we are wondering WHY they care so much about homosexuality, but don't give a shit about eating shellfish or getting divorced. What gives them the right to pick and choose which Biblical laws are important? Why aren't they trying to get a Constitutional Amendement that truly "protects marriage" by banning divorce? |
|||
11-07-2004, 07:02 AM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Death Panel District 9
Posts: 20,921
|
Quote:
|
|
11-07-2004, 01:20 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Death Panel District 9
Posts: 20,921
|
inquisitive01,
First off, what is "Normal"? And how can we know? The conclusion from your logic is that fashion should be static and not culturally determind. Otherwise if enough men being to wear bras and panties, then it becomes Biblically acceptable. Is this correct? God is very specific about what is clean and unclean to eat, but not so on the subject of clothing. Remeber there were no bras and panties then. Women wear men's clothing including underwear all the time and it is very fashionable. (and few men wear three piece suits.) to hyperbole: And what gender are my goat leggings? Masculine of feminie? :huh: |
11-09-2004, 12:22 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
What kind of women's dresses did the men of Biblical times wear? Did they also wear women's evening gowns? Women's lingerie? Women's underwear? Women's panty hose? Women's wigs? Anyway, I'll rephrase it. Men don't normally wear women's dresses. |
|
11-09-2004, 12:58 AM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
For those who think this is a silly issue, Religious Legalism meets Cross Dressing
Quote:
Elaborate justification for why cross dressing is not in fact a sin |
|
11-09-2004, 10:58 PM | #9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So am I a sinner? Cool.
I am wearing: * men's jeans. Because the ones cut for women seem to think my waist is around my ears, while these ones seem to fit quite nicely. * a loose fit Tshirt, wearable by either sex. * a pair of boots that isn't labelled as male or female, but are low and practical and plain, and lots of men wear this style (Blundstones, for the NZ/Aussie contingent) * women's socks, purple * women's underpants, bikini style And when I get up and leave I will be adding a men's motorcycle jacket and a generic unisex helmet. I can't recall if my gloves are women's or generic. (PS: yay for me - 100 posts now) |
11-09-2004, 11:19 PM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere but Colorado, including non-profits
Posts: 8,787
|
Quote:
I wore a woman's skirt as a cape in a melodrama. It worked well. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|