FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2013, 09:47 PM   #81
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse
OK you state it wasnt narrow that it is inclusive.
Then why cant people who worshipped Judaism for centuries be called Jewish?
You use that phrase repeatedly. If they. worshiped 'Judaisim' the religion itself, (which no doubt some indeed did) they were worshipping a religion and not the Deity of that religion.
Faith directed statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Perhaps that is why they even 'forgot' what their deity's name was, or even how to pronounce it?
More tendentiousness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
...been so busy worshipping 'Judaisim' itself, that they no longer had any idea Whom the Elohim of Judaism was, not even so much as His Name?
Even more tendentious claptrap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
They just 'forgot' and could no longer 'call upon The Name יהוה
Yet more such nonsense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Wonder if they're still struggling with 'shibboleth' ?
What a nauseous waste of your readers' time. Please cut it back.
spin is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 09:48 PM   #82
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Do you think you can define Proselytes as Jews, gentiles or both?
The ancient Jewish people did, and Judaism of this day still has quite a bit to say on the matter. After all if one is a Jew or wishes to become a Jew, they should certainly consult with Jewish authorities to learn these Jewish opinions.

However Jewish most reference materials will tell you that there was in those ancient days, more than one kind of 'proselyte', with radically different rules applying, depending upon whether these proselytes had became circumcised or not.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 09:50 PM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse
OK you state it wasnt narrow that it is inclusive.
Then why cant people who worshipped Judaism for centuries be called Jewish?
You use that phrase repeatedly. If they. worshiped 'Judaisim' the religion itself, (which no doubt some indeed did) they were worshipping a religion and not the Deity of that religion.

How do you know that they were not worshipping yahweh?


That is what attracted God-Fearers and Gate Proselytes to Judaism, the one powerful monotheistic god.


They just didnt care about the winky snipping part of it. But spent generations in synagogues doing exactly what every other jews was doing.
outhouse is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 09:55 PM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
What a nauseous waste of your readers' time.
No one is forcing you to read anything here.
If you don't like what I post. Then just don't read it.

There are other threads. Or you can just place me on your ignore list and you won't have to be bothered by what I post.
Or I believe I can come up with a few more suggestions, if you can't think of any yourself.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 10:09 PM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse
OK you state it wasnt narrow that it is inclusive.
Then why cant people who worshiped Judaism for centuries be called Jewish?
You use that phrase repeatedly. If they. worshiped 'Judaism' the religion itself, (which no doubt some indeed did) they were worshiping a religion and not the Deity of that religion.
How do you know that they were not worshiping yahweh?
I don't. I wasn't there.

You are the one that wrote that they were worshiping 'Judaism'.
If you think they were worshiping 'yahweh' why not just say so, instead of writing 'they worshiped Judaism'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse
That is what attracted God-Fearers and Gate Proselytes to Judaism, the one powerful monotheistic god.

They just didnt care about the winky snipping part of it. But spent generations in synagogues doing exactly what every other jews was doing.
Which was ?
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 10:10 PM   #86
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Sheshbazzar, like all the other denialists, has not adduced a single indicator that these therapeutae were not Jewish.
So the Professors Schurer, E. Zeller, Ad. Harnack, Hilgenfeld, Hatch, Robert-
son Smith, Cheyne, Drummond, Littledale, and many others were denialists.

ADDUCE: To cite as an example or means of proof in an unlocked argument.
mountainman is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 10:11 PM   #87
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

You could not have shown that Philo claimed the Therapeutae were Jews or of Jewish origin.

We have examined every word and every line in "On the Contemplative Life" and there is no mention whatsoever that the Therapeutae were Jews.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
And many Gentiles studied those same Holy Scriptures and were also Sabbath keepers. So the fact that these theraputae observed the Scriptural Sabbath is in itself not any valid evidence that they were Jewish.
We have already shown the evidence.

We have already shown that Philo specifically claimed that it was the Essenes who were Jewish.

It is claimed that Paul a Jew and a supposed contemporary of Philo did preach about Jesus to the uncircumcised and that he used Hebrew Scripture.

We know non-Jewish people study Hebrew Scripture because the Old Testament is bolted to the New Testament.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 10:21 PM   #88
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Which was ?
Being Jewish


Its why a Proselyte like Paul viewed himself as Jewish, more or less he was in that time.
outhouse is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 10:52 PM   #89
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by shesh
And many Gentiles studied those same Holy Scriptures and were also Sabbath keepers. So the fact that these theraputae observed the Scriptural Sabbath is in itself not any valid evidence that they were Jewish.
1. They worshiped the same god as Philo.


How do you know that without being circular?
What is the basis for your first bullet point?



Quote:
2. They celebrated the shabbat.
Meanwhile in the Roman Empire after the adoption of the Julian calendar, in the time of Augustus, the seven-day week came into use. The association of the days of the week with the Sun, the Moon, and the five planets visible to the naked eye dates to the Roman era (2nd century).

That a group observed a 7 day week in antiquity does not make them Jewish.
mountainman is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 11:00 PM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default Jewish?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
The number of threads I have personally opened in my ten years of participation on this Forum may still be counted on the fingers of one hand.
I therefore think it not unreasonable that I be permitted to open one more, in response to a request I posed and to whose answer I was not permitted to reply.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Philo indicates that they are in fact Jewish
Philo says not one single word about these 'theraputae' being 'Jewish'.

My congregation also accepts, holds, and teaches all of these things;
The observing the Seventh Day SABBATH rest, the keeping all of the Scripturally commanded Annual Festivals, High SABBATHS, and Fasts of The Torah.
Also diligently teaching the observing of the kosher food laws, as well as the many other injunctions of THE LAW of YHWH,
-yet we are not 'Jewish', nor are we any 'christians'.

Many gentiles who read The Holy Scriptures endeavored to -KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS-, along with the 'Jewish' people, to the extent of their abilities, pleading the mercy of Ha'Shem in whatever matter beyond their control, or knowledge, in which they might fall short of perfection, Not just the Jews.

The Catholic church had a long time problem with these gentile worshipers ('theraputae') that continued to KEEP THE LAWS and to observe THE HOLY SABBATHS and Festivals that were commanded in their Bibles, along with those known as the 'Jews'




Quote:
Church historian Socrates Scholasticus (5th century) observed this also and wrote:
“For although almost all churches throughout the world celebrate the sacred mysteries [of the Lord's Supper] on THE SABBATH of every week, yet the Christians of Alexandria and at Rome, on account of some ancient tradition, have ceased to do this.”
– Socrates Scholasticus, Ecclesiastical History, Book 5, ch. 22.

"If as many suppose, Christians as a whole observed Sunday in place of the "Jewish" SABBATH from resurrection Sunday forward, then why was it necessary for the church to enact ecclesiastical laws to enforce Sunday worship as a day of rest?"
__Clear up into the 7th century and beyond. Inforcing their Popery man made Decrees with terror, torture, and murder.

Now certainly the objection will be raised, this is all about 'Christians'.

To this I will point out, just like many of the GENTILES refused and resisted onto death the change in THE Scriptural SABBATH DAY of rest, there were also many SABBATH keeping -GENTILES- who resisted having the invented catholic name of 'Christian' stuffed down their throats, and would chose rather to die being called 'Judaizers' than bending their knees to vile Papal Decrees, threats, and the tortures and murder carried out by the minions of that succession of despotic and murderously evil Roman Pope's.

Just because some GENTILES observe all of the the Scripturally mandated SABBATHS and SCRIPTURALLY ordained Festivals -along with the Jewish people, that does not make them 'Jewish'.

Even in the Law of Moses, the ger toshavim 'stranger of the gate' ('stranger within thy gates') had NO requirement to be circumcised, to be able love the Elohim of Israel, to thank Him for life's blessings, and to look forward to the fulfillment of His Promises, and to keep THE SABBATHS of YHWH - and praise His Holy Name, -along with- his chosen people Israel.

It was a mixed multitude that was 'passed over' and was delivered into The Promised Land. The Jew and the Gentile together, So it was, and so it is that the Scriptures Promise to both Jew and GENTILE alike that call upon His Holy Name.

Thus there is nothing that entails that the 'theraputae' of old Alexandria, -or of any other place- ever had to be exclusively 'Jewish'.

If Philo knew the Law and the Promises, he would have known what a 'stranger within the gates' was, and of The Law's open accommodation of all such persons.

And if he were a learned Jew indeed, in subjection to The Laws of Moses, he would certainly have accepted the presence of any such Gentiles among the 'theraputae' -worshipers.

Why, with all conscious deliberation, Philo never once used the word 'Jew' or 'Jewish' when writing of these theraputae 'worshipers'.
Someone who follows Judaism and self-identifies with the traditions and beliefs of same.
Steve Weiss is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.