![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boston
Posts: 3,687
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: boston
Posts: 3,687
|
![]()
O.K. I looked. I think it would be much better if contradictions were distinguised from inconsistencies. Nor am I sure what constitutes an inconsistency. The synoptic gospels could be called inconsistent because they don't all relate the same events or relate them identically. Do those qualify?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 177
|
![]()
An unsophisicated yet very readable and fun book is, The Born Again Skeptic's Guide to the Bible (or via: amazon.co.uk), by Ruth Green.
By "unsophisicated," I mean that she is not a scholar--just a person who read the Bible, was horrified, and wrote a 300 page book discussing what she found. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|