FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2003, 09:06 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Roland
First of all, these quotes were uttered in public settings; they were not told to John in confidence.

So did Matthew, Mark and Luke independently sit down and decide each would only discuss "Jesus' life and ministry"? How believable is that?

If YOU had heard Jesus utter those amazing statements in John, would YOU have failed to include them - regardless of the "purpose" of your account?

No, I'm afraid the most rational explanation is that John made up what He felt Jesus would or should have said, to fit his own personal theology - indicating that the gospels are basically well crafted works of theology and not historical accounts of anything.
Would you make something like that up, spend the rest of your life spreading that "myth" and lie, knowing full well you will be executed for it?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 09:42 PM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 759
Default

Why would the Hale bop comet guys kill themselves??

Why would Muslims go on suicide bombing misions??

That argument never works
SkepticBoyLee is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 10:15 PM   #73
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Here
Posts: 234
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Wrong, Jesus claimed to be God. The trinity is all over the Bible. If you deny Jesus' divinity, you deny Him. And Vinnie doesn't even accept the supernatural aspects of the Bible. Well, duh, without Jesus' ressurection, Christianity wouldn't exist! Why vinnie even bothers calling himself Christian is beyond me. Whats the point when you deny every single theological concept that Christianity supports?
In John, Jesus says both "God is greater than I" and also "I and the Father are One." Somewhere in the synoptics, he said "call no man on earth your father" and also "...who made ME a judge?"

If Jesus taught everything in parables (as two or three of the evangelists seem to concur) and used short aphorisms in his speech, then that pretty much leaves propositional theology and logical dogma out of the picture (in my humble opinion based on my TRUE knowledge of the Bible!).

The metaphorical speech put into Jesus' mouth by the evangelists can be profoundly true without being literally factual. When Jesus told the parable of the Good Samaritan, was he assuming literal facts like the report of a mugging on file at the Jericho Police Station? If Jesus could use metaphor and parable to talk about God, then the evangelists could certainly use the same speech to talk about Jesus.
aikido7 is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 10:28 PM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

If the baiting and childish behaviour in this thread does not cease, it will be locked.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 10:35 PM   #75
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Here
Posts: 234
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus
If the baiting and childish behaviour in this thread does not cease, it will be locked.

Joel
I hope it just did. We have a confusion of developing tradition, it seems to me.

There's 1.what Jesus actually said and did, 2. what he said and did that was passed around orally, 3. what the gospel writers said he did, 4. what the Roman government canonized what came from number 3., and finally--5. what Christians and message board posters say today.
aikido7 is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 10:57 PM   #76
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: middle earth
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
That is fairly obvious. The point was on how fundamentals proof-text hunt and use scripture. They take, interpret and apply whatever they can literaly---unless they strongly disagree with it. For instance, Magus rebuttal to this Psalm in this very thread. Do you agree with Magus's response?

Vinnie
Which response? He has a few. I disagree whole heartedly with alot of what you have posted. i agree there is a way to interpret biblical passages without relying on vague feelings and first impressions. It takes a lot of work to correctly interpret Bible passages. This is not to say that the Bible is not easily understood. Only that reason and the intellect which many shun must be used. Outside sources such as Bible dictionaries, maps, historical time lines and concordances are imperative to good study.

p.s. I found it. No I do not agree with Magus
hope's daughter is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 10:59 PM   #77
Tod
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
The response will be original sin.
You're more optimistic than me if you think I'll get a response from him at all. ; )

I rarely do. In fact, I think he only responded to something I said one time.

However, he can't with any coherency make such a claim, since as I pointed out, genes don't have free will. The problems that arise from incest are a result of harmful mutations building in a gene pool without sufficient variation. You'd think that an omnimax God could conceive of and construct a system of replication that wouldn't allow such "defects" to occur at all.
Tod is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 11:00 PM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by aikido7
I hope it just did.
Indeed, thank you very much, aikido7.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 11:04 PM   #79
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: middle earth
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
Not an orthodox Christian, But a theist within the Christian tradition. Qualifies me as a Christian. There are over 30,000 denominations. Theres room for one more
May I ask what denomination?
hope's daughter is offline  
Old 10-27-2003, 11:07 PM   #80
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Mind you, any further posts attacking Vinnie or derailing this thread will be deleted. The thread is broadly on troubling Bible verses. If you want to chase after Vinnie, do it by PM where he is free to put you on Ignore.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.