FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: What best describes the rise of Israel?
The Conquest Model 2 20.00%
The Peaceful Infiltration Model 2 20.00%
The Peasant Revolt Model 0 0%
The Symbiosis Model 6 60.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2004, 04:26 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Default The Ethnogenesis of Israel

I enjoyed the paper:It lends itself admirably to a poll.

[Moderator, please add the word 'Model' to the 4th option. Thanks.]
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 01-15-2004, 07:51 AM   #2
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default Re: The Ethnogenesis of Israel

Quote:
Originally posted by ConsequentAtheist
[Moderator, please add the word 'Model' to the 4th option. Thanks.]
Done.
CX is offline  
Old 01-15-2004, 05:03 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Hey CA,

I'm having trouble with the PDF document (computer too slow). Do you mind explaining what the "Symbiosis" option refers to? I think this poll is a touch limited, but that's just a nitpick. Anyway, check your private messages.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 01-15-2004, 06:25 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Default

This is, as I understand it, essentially the resedentarization model proposed by Finkelstein. I'm curious as to what you would add to the options above.
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 01-19-2004, 09:07 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Ah ok. I think that makes some sense. I was thinking that there's plenty of variation even within so-called models, but your options work as an overall schema. Also, I tend to think of Mendenhall and Albright rather than Yadin or someone more recent when I hear those terms. My vote is Finkelstein, hands down, but not in some of the details--particularly the difficulties of applying his chronology at Hazor (I think he's weak on that point, but can't decide whether I know enough to make a judgement, or I'm just plain stupid).

Joel
Celsus is offline  
Old 01-19-2004, 06:22 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Celsus
My vote is Finkelstein, hands down, but not in some of the details--particularly the difficulties of applying his chronology at Hazor (I think he's weak on that point, but can't decide whether I know enough to make a judgement, or I'm just plain stupid).

Joel
Have you read Devers new book? His critique of Finkelstein seemed pretty sound when I read it.
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 01-19-2004, 07:28 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ConsequentAtheist
Have you read Devers new book? His critique of Finkelstein seemed pretty sound when I read it.
Ack, which one is that? I've already got too long a reading list, and I'm supposed to be studying for the UN exams (completely unrelated, as usual) and will be killed by my better half if I buy any more books at the moment. Still--it could be something to look forward to. I also urge you to come over here too.

Joel
Celsus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.