FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2004, 12:38 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Indeed.

In the "Song of the Sea" sequence of "Crossing the Sea of Reeds/Destruction" stories, I believe there is a "YHWH versus Sea Monster" story that is very similar to the Marduk story.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 12:46 AM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Here is the quote from Westermann:

Quote:
This background [Other creation myths that involve separation of heavens from earth.--Ed.] makes it worthwhile considering the thesis that the Hebrew word for creation by God, Aleph-Resh-Bet [Westermann gives the Hebrew right-to-left.--Ed.], has the original basic meaning of "divide" or "separate," E. Dantinne, "Creation et Separation," Le Museon, 74 (1961) 441-451. He begins with the passages Josh 17:15, 18; Ezek 23:47, . . where the verb mean "cut off" or "cut in pieces." While the new lexicons recognize another root, Gesenius in the Thesaurus and in the dictionary of 1883 had proposed a development in meaning from the concrete "separate, divide" to the more abstract "create." "To express the idea of creating . . . the ancient Hebrews used a word associated with the idea of separation which is so often explicitly mentioned in the narrative of creation," p. 446.
this is from his Genesis: An Introduction, Fortress Press, 34-35.

I had sent it to another poster some time ago. I believe I have the Hebrew correct--sorry book is at another place.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 12:55 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Doctor X
In the "Song of the Sea" sequence of "Crossing the Sea of Reeds/Destruction" stories, I believe there is a "YHWH versus Sea Monster" story that is very similar to the Marduk story.
There's a lot of it about. In Ugarit the chaos dragon is called Lotan, a name which is a cognate of Leviathan and one should check out Isaiah 27:1 for an almost exact replication of a Ugaritic statement about Lotan:

On that day the Lord with his cruel and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will kill the dragon that is in the sea.

Then there's another name, Rahab. Check out Ps 89:9-10 or Isaiah 51:9,

Was it not you who cut Rahab in pieces, who pierced the dragon? Was it not you who dried up the sea, the waters of the great deep

The water dragon and its battle with the god is quite a common trope in Hebrew literature.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 04:39 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
Yes, indeed, it seems like God created the cosmos out of the waters. How does the dry world of the second creation fit into this? It doesn't of course. It's a different story.
Am I correct in thinking that this second creation story is also stolen (er, I mean 'adapted') from the Sumerians?
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 04:59 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

It appears so.

I do not have the reference infront of me--Kramer's work on "First" in history by the Sumerians--but he explains the basis for Eden--even located in the same place. He also explains the source for the "rib."

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 07:10 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Pervy Hobbit Fancier
Am I correct in thinking that this second creation story is also stolen (er, I mean 'adapted') from the Sumerians?
Stolen? No. Many of the theological and mythological materials were shared culture by various groups throughout the fertile crescent.

More closely related materials in which textual connections can be made are a different situation. The first Genesis account suggests someone's literary knowledge in its development. Isaiah 27:1 suggests borrowing from sources which adhere to Ugaritic traditions. (I can't see a direct link between Ugaritic and Hebrew: there's too much of a time gap between them.)


spin
spin is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 09:01 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Amerrka
Posts: 688
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Creation ex nihilo

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
But dust is dust is dust and all that keeps your dust together is the revised image of God after which man is re-created.
*looks at his skin cells*

Oh I see how my dust is kept together now...I was told in biology that when cells hit each other when multiplying, they basically stop unless it's cancer, BUT NOW I SEE!
EGGO is offline  
Old 01-11-2004, 09:07 PM   #18
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Creation ex nihilo

Quote:
Originally posted by EGGO
*looks at his skin cells*

Oh I see how my dust is kept together now...I was told in biology that when cells hit each other when multiplying, they basically stop unless it's cancer, BUT NOW I SEE!
Ornry little things are'nt they? They seem to have a mind of their own.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.