![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 701
|
![]()
I'm discussing a Psalm 137:6-9 on a Catholic forum, and they keep quoting "Douay Rheims" translations and interpretations. The interpretation seems bizarre to me...
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douay-Rheims I guess I don't really have a point behind this thread, other than just to vent my frustration ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 13,161
|
![]()
Even though you may not have any point, I sympathize with your frustration. People who can accept such an obviously absurd interpretation are not amenable to reason and simply desire for the difficulty to be magically resolved by a relatively authoritative source.
If anything, I would point out that such a violent and vile metaphor would never be appropriate for a supposedly loving deity. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 58
|
![]()
Rocko: You can't chuck bowling balls at us!
Schnitzel Cult Leader: Yes, we can. Says so in the Great Book of Bratwurst. [reads] Schnitzel Cult Leader: "And if there is one among you who does not follow the ways of the Schnitzel, let that one go, and do not throw bowling balls at them." Rocko: You see? It says let us go. Schnitzel Cult Leader: It's a matter of interpretation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 188
|
![]()
I like that explanation, interesting metaphor.
Too bad it's not what it meant. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|