FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2010, 02:38 AM   #41
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

"The Revelation of the Magi"........

Yet another "Gnostic text"? An entertaining story of the Magi, their history, their role in attending the birth of the Jesus Star, and their ultimate conversion to Christianity in a far-off land by Thomas Judas (of great fame in his "Acts of Thomas" where he converts the Indians from Hinduism and Buddhism). Why the Magi were required to be converted from their tradition to Christianity is rhetorical.

Salvaged from the Vatican archives .... thought to have been originally authored in the 2nd or the 3rd century, as a prelude and a revelation to the importance of Nicaean Christianity. Of course, there was a different type of "Magi" after the year 222 CE, following Ardashir's revolution over the Parthian civilisation.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The author mentions that Pope Paul IV, who instituted the Index Librorum Prohibitorum in 1559, regarded the OIM as heretical and consigned it to the list.
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-21-2010, 12:55 PM   #42
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
This is a really interesting dissertation. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.

Andrew Criddle
I'll second all that Toto. How did you happen to find that? Everyone tracking the number of Gnostic gospels, acts and revelations/Apocalypses, etc will have to add another "new and strange" entry to their list. Thank you for posting these links.
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-21-2010, 01:16 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: look behind you...
Posts: 2,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
Humm, there seem to be several mentions of 3 Magi throughout Mithraism. Pluck out the relevant quotes if you wish.
Roger Pearse has done a wonderful job getting the references to Mithras in early literature. Could YOU pick out a relevant quote, and tell us why it is relevant, please?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
Acharya writes:
In the gospel story, Jesus's birth is signaled by a bright star and a visit from wise men or magi, as they are termed in the New Testament, representing Persian astrologers following the star. Despite the stellar brilliance and obviousness, this tracking was apparently not a simple act, since these "wise men" are depicted as nevertheless illogically becoming hopelessly lost and must ask Christ's enemy King Herod for assistance.
Actually, Acharya is wrong to talk about the magi "tracking" the star to Jerusalem. And I have no idea where she gets that they "are depicted as nevertheless illogically becoming hopelessly lost". "Illogically"? "Hopelessly lost"?

In fact, the story doesn't have the magi following the star, at least not until the end as they were approaching Bethlehem. The magi see the star in the east, which indicated to them that a King of the Jews had been born. So they (logically!) go to Jerusalem to look for the child. At Jerusalem, Herod sends the magi on to Bethlehem, and it is only as they approach Bethlehem that the star indicates where Jesus could be found.
I find this laughable, given the fact that King Herod was also looking for the Christ child for an entirely different reason.
OLDMAN is offline  
Old 12-21-2010, 06:37 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

I'm still in favor of the female Magus/Magi
Cege is offline  
Old 12-22-2010, 08:50 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave31 View Post
Quote:
John Kesler "I would be wary of citing D.M. Murdock/Acharya S--who in turn quotes from Barbara G. Walker, a journalist and knitter!"
Nice ad hom and credentialism there, John. I'd be more wary of citing meditation guru John Kesler, honestly. Have you even actually read a book of Acharya's or are you just repeating the nonsense you've heard from others who also haven't actually read her work just so you can attack it then, promote your own interpretations?
I've read enough of her to know that she appeals to paganism and astrology readily, even though Jewish antecedents--the Hebrew Bible, the haggadah, pseudepigrapha, The Apocrypha, etc.--are more likely sources.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 12-22-2010, 11:36 AM   #46
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post

I've read enough of her to know that she appeals to paganism and astrology readily, even though Jewish antecedents--the Hebrew Bible, the haggadah, pseudepigrapha, The Apocrypha, etc.--are more likely sources.
Christianity was obviously heavily influenced by Judaism and might even have started as a Jewish cult. But it is not Judaism. It's a composite of Jewish and Greek religious ideas.

So to see paganism and astrology in Christianity is not an off the wall idea, it's ordinary. That said, specific claims might still be outrageous, but the general concept is not.
spamandham is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:18 PM   #47
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
But I can go on to say that in Matthew Joseph got Mary's sister pregnant who was the temple tramp from the TOK and not the woman from the TOL and so did not come from Nazareth and hence had no manger for the child but this Mary was the Egyptian harlot likely playing gyspsy music in his dream and even according to Ann Landers such a one night stand is not a good thing to do.

Just take a look at how Matthew's Jesus was said to come from Nazareth which was after the fact wherefore then his Jesus was conceived in sin while in abroad in Egypt which may be fun but this child does not fit the lineage very well with no swadling cloths to be found and I wish somebody would have told Billy Graham about that too who actually thought that you can drag bastard children into heaven.

Please note that Nazareth was that beautifull little city of God that exists only in the TOL by way of iconic imprinting [as opposed to phantasm making in lala-land] on the RNA and therefore is likely the last thing to leave behind but has got to go before ascension can take place.

I don't suppose anyone cares much about this but in case you wondered how it was that Joseph got "Mary's sister pregant," this then is because Matthew's Jesus is James who was conceived in the TOK or conscious mind where temple tramp Eve is at (who is the recipient of this dream and not Nazareth). This makes James the brother of Jesus as 'reborn from below' or from carnal desire in Jn 1:13 and so for whom darkness remains (she was called Magdalene later) . . . wherefore then Mary is said to be the second Eve because she replaced the function of Eve with the vacancy of the conscious mind after the upper room is occupied by way of ascension.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-06-2011, 12:07 PM   #48
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
It's beginning to seem a lot like Christmas . . .

Brent Landau, a professor of religious studies at the University of Oklahoma and an expert in ancient biblical languages, found references to a text about the wise men in writings from the Middle Ages and learned that a collector in the 18th century had discovered in a Turkish monastery a manuscript called "the Revelation of the Magi" with a narrative about the wise men. He gave it to the Vatican Library, where the document, written on vellum, a type of parchment made of animal skin, remains archived away in virtual obscurity.
Wow. It's been three years since I posted here... didn't even know they changed the name.

Anyway, The "magi" or "wisemen" are all fictional characters either way. The writing which you speak of is a third party writing which gives a perspective from the "magi's" point of view. It is no different than the author who wrote a book about the Wicked Witch of the West and East (called Wicked).

Though there was no original story line for the witch, the author wrote about one of the characters who had very little to do with the original story "The Wizard of Oz", but yet, the book was written and went on to tell the story of the Wicked Witche's son in the second book....

All fables, stories and make believe.
digitalbeachbum is offline  
Old 01-06-2011, 08:05 PM   #49
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalbeachbum View Post
[Though there was no original story line for the witch, the author wrote about one of the characters who had very little to do with the original story "The Wizard of Oz", but yet, the book was written and went on to tell the story of the Wicked Witche's son in the second book....

All fables, stories and make believe.
Of course they are and we all know about 'wicketness' so we can relate to that idea but this is about light itself and the origin of light that is different from the light of common day which is the illusion that can expose darkness and later wickedness as an opposite to goodness. This light that the magi followed is different and has no opposite in dark and therefore is the source of all goodness. It so is the source of illumination and it is just too bad that Joseph was not home when they arrived.

To 'make believe' requires cooperation our part for which we must be connected to the same source to start with or we could have no knowledge thereoff and in the end could sentience not part be of us.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-06-2011, 08:32 PM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Gday,

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
I think the earliest reference to the Magi would have to be Celsus
Hmm,
A quick and crude text search shows "magi" mentioned in :

Polybius, 2nd C. BCE, History 34 :
"So the priests of the Egyptians, the Chaldeans, and the Magi, being superior to the rest of the world in wisdom, obtained rule and honour in former generations."

Diodorus Siculus, 1st C. BCE, History 16 :
"The latter was a descendant of one of the seven Persians who deposed the Magi."

Cicero, 1st C. BCE, On the Nature of the Gods
"And with the mistaken notions of the poets may be classed the extravagances of the magi, the delusions entertained on the same subject by the Egyptians, and also the beliefs of the common people, which from ignorance of the truth are involved in the greatest inconsistency."

Strabo, 1st C. BCE, Geography 15 :
"The tribes which inhabit the country are the Pateischoreis, as they are called, and the Achaemenidae and the Magi. Now the Magi follow with zeal a kind of august life, whereas the Cyrtii and the Mardi are brigands and others are farmers."

Vitruvius Pollio, 1st C. BCE, Architecture 7 :
"AMONG the Seven Sages, Thales of Miletus pronounced for water as the primordial element in all things; Heraclitus, for fire; the priests of the Magi, for water and fire;"

Philo, 1st C. CE, QA Genesis I :
"The Tigris is a very cruel and mischievous river, as the citizens of Babylon bear witness, and so do the magi, who have found it to be of a character quite different from the nature of other rivers; "

Josephus, 1st C. CE, Antiquities 11 :
"AFTER the slaughter of file Magi, who, upon the death of Cambyses, attained the government of the Persians for a year, those families which were called the seven families of the Persians appointed Darius, the son of Hystaspes, to be
their king. "

Pliny Elder, 1st C. CE, History 21 :
"According to the Magi, the person who crowns himself with a chaplet composed of this flower, and takes his unguents from a box of gold, of the kind generally known as "apyron," will be sure to secure esteem and glory among his fellowmen. Such are the flowers of spring."

Plutarch, 1st C. CE, Isis & Osiris :
"Theopompus says that, according to the Magi, one of the Gods shall conquer, the other be conquered, alternately for 3,000 years; for another 3,000 years they shall fight, war, and undo one the works of the other;"

Followed by later mentions in :
Appian, Justin Martyr, Lucian, Minucius F., Athenaeus, Bardesanes, ClementAlex., Melito, Irenaeus, Tatian; and many many more from 3rd C. on.


(Not sure they all mean the same "magi" though.)


Kapyong
Kapyong is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.