FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Biblical Criticism - 2001
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-09-2001, 09:52 PM   #1
Posts: n/a
Post How can Acts be dated late?

Acts is usually considered to be a largely legendary book (akin to the gospels) and is dated in the mid-to-late second century AD. However, I have never heard a satisfacory explanation for it's abrupt ending by anyone adhering to the view of it as a legendary document. The book ends suddenly, leaving Paul and his companions in Rome, "Boldly and without hinderance preach[ing] the kingdom of God and [teaching] about the Lord Jesus Christ". Paul is not martyred! Now, there can be no doubt that the early Christians glorified martyrdom and held that it was a thing to be honored. So, if Acts is legendary, why in the world wouldn't it's author/authors have tacked on a grand and glorious martyrdom of Paul? Furthermore, Paul and Peter are the two apostles concerning whose martyrdoms there is very little question among Biblical scholars from ANY school of Biblical Criticism. Even more inexplicable than the fact that the writer(s) fo Acts did not incorporate a legendary martyrdom is that Paul almost certainly WAS martyred, and yet that actual event is not recorded! I look forward to your responses, for on my own, I have been utterly unable to reconcile the legendary view of Acts with this fact.

Old 06-10-2001, 02:05 AM   #2
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549

What have you read about the dating of Acts? Randel Helms, in Who Wrote the Gospels? presents a pretty convincing case that Acts is entirely fictional, whatever its date.

There may have been literary reasons for ending Acts with Paul still alive in Rome. Or the author may have intended a sequel, which was never written or has been lost.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-10-2001, 04:51 PM   #3
Posts: n/a

Thanks, Toto.

Should I take the lack of responses as evidence that Toto's is the only theory? Surely there are others! Maybe it's just that nobody likes me...*sniff*


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 PM.


This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.