Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-19-2001, 01:57 PM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
virgin birth supported in the OT?
I ran across this:
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/fabprof2.html and, as I'm not particularly well versed in these matters, I was wondering how truthful it is. More precisely, are the definitions it gives of almah and bethulah correct? |
05-19-2001, 03:20 PM | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All the examples they give for claiming betula can mean non-virgin show nothing of the sort:
Ezek 23:3: the two women were virgins and lost their virginities in Egypt. "The breasts of their virginity" means "their breasts while they were virgins". Joel 1:8: Hebrew ba'al means "husband"; whether the husband has committed intercourse is not stated. Specifically, ba'al n'ureha (the husband of her youth) means "the one who was wedded/betrothed to her in youth". Esther 2:17: the Persian king simply took a virgin every night and devirginized her. It was a common oriental palace custom, as also told in the Arabian Nights. |
05-20-2001, 03:30 PM | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Esther 2:17: the Persian king simply took a virgin every night and devirginized her. It was a common oriental palace custom, as also told in the Arabian Nights."
Our pal Gilgamesh gets credit for starting the custom of going on the honeymoon with the bride & groom and getting first dibs on the bride! |
05-21-2001, 11:42 AM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your help, guys. Better to check that it is nonsense before I confidently claim so, though, isn't it?!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|