Can someone tell me exactly why my friend "SecWebLurker" was banned? What did he do to provoke banning? I checked his last post for the most "offensive" or disruptive things he said, and it didn't seem like he was doing anything unique compared to what goes on here.

Sec: This post by Earl was just a hoot. No need to take anything in it seriously.

penatis:
"I am beginning to understand why no one takes Nomad seriously."

lpetrich
posted April 10, 2001 11:26 PM
"That is almost too absurd to take seriously. "

SingleDad
posted December 27, 2000 09:35 PM
"There's no way, however, that I'm ever going to treat you seriously. "

SingleDad
posted April 01, 2001 10:02 PM
you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel here. Just because I can't absolutely rule out your bizarre ideas doesn't mean I must enslave myself to your will.

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
Are you really that fuckin' thick? Say it isn't so, Nomad!

SWL: Yeah! Uh, try apocalyptic, Earl. I can't believe you would post garbage like this.

turtonm
posted April 01, 2001 07:19 PM
Fine Tuning is garbage

Duck of Death
It pleases me that an obviously intelligent man like yourself can read this garbage and realise what meaningless nonsense it really is.

wyzaard
Pure anthropic garbage, much like most ID theorists such as Dembsky.

Orpheous99
Of course they are doing this for the profit, the sheep eat this sort of garbage up. There is one born every minute.


Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 08, 2001 11:07 AM
shut yer pie hole!

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
One of these days you'll wake up and go, "Holy Shit! What a pathetic waste of time my life has been!


Cygnus
posted October 09, 2000 12:34 AM
Ya know... you are a fuckin' fruitcake. Not only are you fucked in the head regarding the issue that we are discussing but you are inventing shit which makes no sense at all. Don't post to me again because I won't bother to read it. Seek help, nutball.

Soulofdarwin
posted December 30, 2000 12:14 AM
I e-mailed one of your posts to Mr. Dawkins, who confirmed what I suspected - that you are full of crap. Judging from his response, my bet is that he'll nail your ass to the wall in any debate that you would like to have.


Lil Lucey
posted February 10, 2001 03:14 PM
This doesn't seem the appropriate spot to post such nonsense when you know that most of the people here don't believe this god exists, and know that genesis is a fairytale


Duck of Death
posted March 18, 2001 01:35 PM
Sorry about the insult, but I've no time for Metacrock's crap.


SingleDad
posted March 20, 2001 01:58 PM
Your old "two sources of error" bullshit.

Zoroaster
posted January 22, 2001 01:26 AM
You are so full of shit. I can't believe you are actually promoting this crap

Orpheous99
they are not interested in the crap you put there. Are you taking anything for your delusional state?

SingleDad
posted April 01, 2001 10:02 PM
Just because I can't absolutely rule out your bizarre ideas doesn't mean I must enslave myself to your will.


SingleDad
posted December 30, 2000 08:24
I don't feel like I have to respond to each and every stupid post that horse's ass feels like he has to make.

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
Let's take a trip through Nomad's delusions of grandeur and prove conclusively what a pointless, evasive annoying little gnat of a thumper he truly is, shall we?

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
And you're questioning my understanding of debate? What the fuck is wrong with you?

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
I didn't even include the centuries of torture and murder that makes you sooooo mad, you adorable little brain-dead thumper you!

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
So it's your whim we're offering arguments against? Fuck off!


Sec: AAAhahahahhaha! This is too much!


Zoroaster
posted December 30, 2000 02:51 AM
One wonders exactly who these idiots think they are fooling. Do they really think we are buying this crap?

DennisMcD
posted January 02, 2001 04:17 PM
You're an unholy waste of time


Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 06, 2001 11:36 AM
Not that I haven't enjoyed butting heads with this stupidity as I'm all for deprogramming cult members. Also, I'm sure that their transparent attempts have probably served our cause (whatever the hell that may be)

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
You continuously refer to the gospels as evidence against any of our "theories," so justify the validity of their use as any form of evidence before this stupidity goes another post!

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
Yes, Mr. Pot? These drinks are from Mr. Kettle's table...He'd deliver them himself but he's vomiting too hard from hysterical laughter...

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
Are you clinically insane or just happy to see me?

Koyaanisqatsi
posted April 04, 2001 03:22 PM
blah blah blah blah...Put up or shut up, little boy!

If SecWebLurker finds someone else's views to be consistently absolutely untenable, should they be kicked off for referring to them as 'garbage', 'silly', 'wacky', etc.? Especially in light of what has been said by others here?

I think that is the funniest post I've ever read.

ROFLMAO!

How do I respond to this? What do I say? It's not exactly specific...let me just say:

Some goats have one Horn. Others have two.

I should say that I don't think it's funny if someone was censored. I just thought all the ad hominems were hilarious.

Do you keep a file of all those comments? How did you get that?

Ah,

Just go up to "Search" and do a word search or a name-search.

Bede

I don't know what is going on here but if SecWebLurker has indeed been banned he should be reinstated forewith with an apology from whoever is responsible.

It may just be a technical error but if not, anyone who actually reads Earl's overlong and repetitve posts should be given a medal, not condemned.

B

Why was SecWebLurker banned? Is this a form of viewpoint discrimination? Or can you demonstrate that he did something outrageous?

What a pathetic development.

To my knowledge, SecWebLurker has not been "banned."

rodahi

Is there anything you could do to check on this?

I truly appreciate your response Rodahi.

I have found no evidence to support the contention that SecWebLurker has been banned from the Internet Infidels Discussion Forum. I will keep checking.

rodahi