FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2003, 12:35 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default How do you Define "Murder"?

I posted this in the other philosophy forum, but I thought it would also be appropriate here.

My friend Shadownought helped me come up with a solid definition of it, IMO.

Murder, to me, is the killing of someone else for deplorable motives.

Therefore, to me, suicide is not murder, as you are only killing yourself, not anyone else.

Euthanasia is not murder - it is done out of respect for the other person's autonomy, and with the motive of ending their suffering. We euthanise our pets all the time, and that is not considered to be murder.

What are your views on this?
winstonjen is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 12:39 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 156
Default Murder - n.

An immoral killing.

Murder - v. to kill for immoral reasons or through immoral means.

The question then is not is X a case of murder, but rather, is X a killing, then, is the killing an immoral one.
AnthonyAdams45 is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 12:51 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default Re: Murder - n.

Quote:
Originally posted by AnthonyAdams45
An immoral killing.

Murder - v. to kill for immoral reasons or through immoral means.

The question then is not is X a case of murder, but rather, is X a killing, then, is the killing an immoral one.
I agree with that, but does that definition of murder apply to killing oneself, or only to killing others?
winstonjen is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 01:34 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 156
Default I intend...

that it apply to all killings of any kind, self, other selves, non-selves, etc.
AnthonyAdams45 is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 01:37 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: http://10.0.0.2/
Posts: 6,623
Default

Murder is a legal term, not a philosophical one. In the law, to prove that a killing is murder, you need the following things:

* A degree of premeditation
* A motive
* A means (a gun, poison, whatever)
* An opportunity

The law sees no distinction between a "good" motive (eg euthanasia) and a "bad" motive.
Oxymoron is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 02:52 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
The law sees no distinction between a "good" motive (eg euthanasia) and a "bad" motive.
Then, in my view, the law is flawed, and needs to be revised, perhaps through a referrendum.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 06:01 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
Default

Is abortion is a form of murder?
Answerer is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 06:16 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Answerer
Is abortion is a form of murder?
To me, it is if the abortion is not justified (eg. fatal birth defects).
winstonjen is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 06:56 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 156
Default

Would you agree that the justification has a moral component? That what justifies aborting an fetus with some sort of terminal defects is an attempt to behave morally, either toward the fetus, the mother, other family members, or the society at large?
AnthonyAdams45 is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 07:07 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AnthonyAdams45
Would you agree that the justification has a moral component? That what justifies aborting an fetus with some sort of terminal defects is an attempt to behave morally, either toward the fetus, the mother, other family members, or the society at large?
The justification must be made from the victim's point of view. With murder, society is not being killed. The ones most directly affected should have the most say. With abortion, this is not possible with the baby - it cannot communicate.
winstonjen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.