FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2003, 12:44 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default Accuracy of timelines

Historical accuracy holds the key to power. Why? Because if the accuracy (or nearest proximity attainable) is ascertained, this dispells myths purported onto people, for certain agendas. This is most evident within the religious field. I'd like to know what you've found to be the most scholarly and sound account for the timeline of history and world events.

These are two that I have:

http://campus.northpark.edu/history...Prehistory.html

http://www.b17.com/family/lwp/chron...prehistory.html

Questions:

1) Were these links helpful to anyone who may have wanted links to websites like these?

2) Pro/cons of these versions of history

3) Do you have any qualms with these accounts? ( theists and non-theists, alike)

4) Can you articulate your qualms for me, and provide, to the best of your knowledge, to be more reputable or accurate sources? (BTW could you provide sources whether or not you have material issues with these links or not?)

Regards,

Invictus
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 01:27 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

Your links are broken. They have ellipses in them.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 04:44 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 14
Default

This is my first post here...

Anyway, I think this page is the second link that Soul Invictus intended to post.

http://www.b17.com/family/lwp/chrono...rehistory.html
Quiet One is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 06:46 PM   #4
RBH
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 15,407
Default

I hung right in there with that second link until I ran into this:
Quote:
433,517 BCE to 71,517 BCE: Alorus became king; he ruled for 162,000 years; from 433,517 to 271,517 BCE as reckoned by L. C. Gerts.
I thought Alorus reigned for just 151,267 years. Oh, well.

RBH
RBH is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 11:20 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
Your links are broken. They have ellipses in them.
Sorry All -

Someone did fix the second link for me. The first one is as such:

http://campus.northpark.edu/history/...rehistory.html
Soul Invictus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.