FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2003, 09:34 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, England, UK, Europe, Planet Earth
Posts: 2,394
Default Biblical Pi? Or, is the latest Inifdels article wrong?

The latest article from the kiosk (CLICK ME) is essentially a discussion of why notions of "equal time" are wrong. However, it cites a Biblical value of Pi as exactly 3. This interesting article from Dr Dino suggests otherwise Dino .

What do people think of that as a rebuttal? Is the maths any good? (Mines awful) And is it a sensible point? Even though I don't think the Bible is infallible, there are a lot of times when errors are made out by skeptics to be a lot more serious than they are.
BolshyFaker is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 09:38 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, England, UK, Europe, Planet Earth
Posts: 2,394
Default PS

Heres the passage from 1 kings to save some time...

Kings
BolshyFaker is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 10:19 AM   #3
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default Re: Biblical Pi? Or, is the latest Inifdels article wrong?

Quote:
Originally posted by BolshyFaker
The latest article from the kiosk (CLICK ME) is essentially a discussion of why notions of "equal time" are wrong. However, it cites a Biblical value of Pi as exactly 3. This interesting article from Dr Dino suggests otherwise Dino .

What do people think of that as a rebuttal? Is the maths any good? (Mines awful) And is it a sensible point? Even though I don't think the Bible is infallible, there are a lot of times when errors are made out by skeptics to be a lot more serious than they are.
Kent Hovind's rhetoric isn't worth the effort it takes to click a hyperlink.
CX is offline  
Old 05-16-2003, 11:36 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arcadia, IN, USA
Posts: 308
Default

Hovind's "rebuttal" basically says that it was 30 cubits, if you measured the inside... That very well may be, but at this point it's impossible to say and there is no point in speculating about it, especially since the bible doesn't say anything to that effect.

He made the Sea of cast metal, circular in shape, measuring ten cubits from rim to rim and five cubits high. It took a line of thirty cubits to measure around it.

I'll go on to say, that I also don't think it's all that convincing since the true figure would be 31.4. All it really does say is that God did not write that passage himself. There are much better contradictions.
cpickett is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.