FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2003, 04:59 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Question "Long Pig": is it kosher?

I can't find any reference to human flesh, either as "clean" or as "unclean", in the dietary codes of Leviticus or Deuteronomy.

So, would human flesh be kosher if suitably prepared? Is there no Biblical prohibition on eating it, or have I missed something?

When that plane crashed in the Andes, and some of the passengers survived by eating the dead: didn't some religious folks object? Did they have Biblical grounds for their objection, or was it another case of "I don't think it's right, therefore I assume God doesn't either"?

It would seem to be a surprising omission. Generally, sacrificial animals consist of things that the priests can eat afterwards, and the Hebrews did occasionally sacrifice humans, according to the Bible...
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 05:03 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edinburgh. Scotland
Posts: 2,532
Default

From memory I think the Catholic church went out of its way to exonerate the passengers that ate the dead in the Andes. It was OK by them, though I've no idea on the theological background.
seanie is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 05:20 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA, Faith-Based States of Jesusland
Posts: 1,794
Default

Lev. 11:3: "Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, [and] cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat." Since human beings don't fit that description, I assume that human flesh isn't kosher.
Aravnah Ornan is offline  
Old 06-11-2003, 05:29 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

That verse wouldn't be relevant to humans: the authors wouldn't place us "among the beasts".

Also, while the Bible specifically declares some meats to be "clean" and others "unclean", it's rather hazy on the status of meats not mentioned in either category. Apparently, cloven-hoofed animals are out if they don't chew the cud, and cud-chewers are out if they're not cloven-hoofed. Neither applies to us.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 06-13-2003, 03:08 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Cool

Another angle on this:

Cannibals typically believe that eating people is a magical/religious rite which confers the strength of an enemy, the wisdom of your grandfather etc. This doesn't really fit with the modern J/C concept of a person's vital essence residing in an immaterial "soul".

But what about the story of Samson and Delilah? A J/C myth in which a hero's magical vitality resides in a removable body part (hair, in this case). That's only a small step away from the notion of a hero's vitality residing in a removable, edible body part...

...And, of course, there's the whole "transubstantiation" thing in Christianity (symbolic ritual cannibalism).
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.