FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2003, 06:55 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default Vatican's twisted knickers

I don't see why the Vatican (inventors of the fiction ="The Roman Catholic Church") and other "Christian" groups are getting their knickers in a twist about (alleged) human reproductive cloning? After all, it is "Roman Catholicism" which has perpetuated the early human MYTHS of "gods"s impregnating human females to produce divine male saviours and other supermen.
Before the Pope starts a big fat razzledazzle against human cloning (whether it's already been accomplished or not), he'd better bloody get on the stick and admit that that damnfool dogma of the Virgin Birth of Their Lord is a LIE.
To begin w/, as I keep reiterating, any kid born of an unimpregnated human mother, without a human male father's intervention, would have to be a FEMALE (clone of its Mother) because 's NO WAY it could have the MALE Y chromosome necessary to make it a (= defective) human male.
Mary of Nazareth's alleged kid HAD a human MALE Father, if the kid was a MALE; or else, if it did not ever HAVE a HUMAN MALE Father, it = Jesus of nazareth, has to have been a FEMALE, like her Mother.
Answer this, Joe Ratsinger.
abe smith is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 11:52 AM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: no longer here
Posts: 100
Default Re: Vatican's twisted knickers

Given my years of Catholic school brainwashing (yes, I'm over it), and years of debating theists, I'll bet I can predict the most popular theist answers for these excellent questions:

Quote:
Originally posted by abe smith
[B]I don't see why the Vatican (inventors of the fiction ="The Roman Catholic Church") and other "Christian" groups are getting their knickers in a twist about (alleged) human reproductive cloning?
Because supposedly only God is justified in creating human life. Who are we to "play God"?
(Yeah, I know, there's the doctor/medicine thing, but somehow that's "different". :banghead: )

Additionally, there's a soul-related issue in there. (If God doesn't create the kid, does it still have a God-given soul? etc.)

Quote:
Before the Pope starts a big fat razzledazzle against human cloning (whether it's already been accomplished or not), he'd better bloody get on the stick and admit that that damnfool dogma of the Virgin Birth of Their Lord is a LIE.
Please don't hold your breath.

Quote:
To begin w/, as I keep reiterating, any kid born of an unimpregnated human mother, without a human male father's intervention, would have to be a FEMALE (clone of its Mother) because 's NO WAY it could have the MALE Y chromosome necessary to make it a (= defective) human male.
"With God, all things are possible."

SmartBlonde57 is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 06:08 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 1,230
Default

Actually, I've always wondered how Christians rationalized the fact that Jesus [assuming he existed, which is rather unlikely, in my opinion] was a male.

Did God inject some divine sperm into Mary's womb?

Cheers,

Michael
The Lone Ranger is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 08:58 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,613
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Lone Ranger
Did God inject some divine sperm into Mary's womb?

Cheers,

Michael
It's a package deal. Along with virgin births, you get water-walking, talking asses, and Lazerus freaking people out.
snoiduspoitus is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 03:55 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: no longer here
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Lone Ranger
Actually, I've always wondered how Christians rationalized the fact that Jesus [assuming he existed, which is rather unlikely, in my opinion] was a male.

Did God inject some divine sperm into Mary's womb?
Ours is not to question the ways of The Lord, darlin'. <sigh>
SmartBlonde57 is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 03:56 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: no longer here
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by snoiduspoitus
It's a package deal. Along with virgin births, you get water-walking, talking asses, and Lazerus freaking people out.
Yeah. Lots of talking asses.
<giggle>
SmartBlonde57 is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 05:02 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Default

"Have child like faith in the Lord" "Don't ask questions that our puny minds can't understand!"

P.S. Don't forget the talking snakes...
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 05:38 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: no longer here
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mad Kally
P.S. Don't forget the talking snakes...
Yeah. Think of the Freudian implications.
SmartBlonde57 is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 07:22 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Racine, Wi. USA
Posts: 768
Default

Vatican's twisted knickers


I always wondered what he wore under those robes. I thought it might be Mormon funny underware.

The Admiral
The Admiral is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 03:13 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: no longer here
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Admiral
I always wondered what he wore under those robes.
Ask an altar boy.
SmartBlonde57 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.