FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2003, 08:53 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
Talking Kids, Sex, and Stuff

The other day in Psych 101 we read this article about a girl ("Genie") who was locked in a closet strapped to a potty for the first 13 years of her life, deprived of just about everything you can be deprived of aside from food and water. An interesting thing I read in the article is that the girl when brought into society masturbated constantly with just about anything she could find.

I just thought this was interesting and was wondering if it made anyone think at all about what they think of children, innocence, sex, masturbation, consent, and societal conditioning. I don't really intend to get into the stuff like "Man-Boy Love" did but I was just curious.

-B
Bumble Bee Tuna is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 04:11 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Beautiful Colorado
Posts: 682
Default

She would have been uneducated in the most extreme form of the word, maybe non-verbal, but apart from pyschological trauma, she would still have mental capacities in there somewhere. There could be many reasons but I would imagine the most likely would be that it was a very comfortable and familiar method of self-love and pleasure to her. I don't see how innocence figures in.

I have read that most children discover 'those parts' feel very nice when manipulated at a young age. What stops them is parental instruction and/or guilt. They also develop socially to understand it isn't acceptable to pleasure yourself in public.

I guess, what I am trying to say, is that it doesn't surprise me. It is a normal physical issue, a base drive and comforting to boot.
Talulah is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 05:52 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

I agree with Talulah. It would be something she found comforting and pleasurable and wasn't socialised out of. Also, being brought out into society would be extremely stressful for her. If masturbation was the only comfort she had ever had, she would be likely to do it more frequently when she came into such a stressful situation and had no other way of coping.
TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 06:22 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Talulah
She would have been uneducated in the most extreme form of the word, maybe non-verbal
She was non-verbal. No one was ever able to teach her how to speak or understand the spoken word. She is a classic case study used in support of the notion of a "critical period" of psychological development. By the time she was discovered and released, her brain had essentially stopped growing and was hard-wired. It had not formed essential structures necessary for many complex human thought processes.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 06:50 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
Default

I'm with Tal, Treacle and Lobstrosity on this one. I saw an episode of Nova about Genie some time ago and I do not believe she was exploring the complexities of her sexuality when masturbating, but was instead engaging in a basic, physically pleasurable activity.
livius drusus is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 07:37 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by livius drusus
I do not believe she was exploring the complexities of her sexuality when masturbating, but was instead engaging in a basic, physically pleasurable activity.
Well I must admit that when I'm bashing the bishop or tugging the todger it is definitely a detailed exploration of my sexuality!

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 10:02 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Beautiful Colorado
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
She was non-verbal. No one was ever able to teach her how to speak or understand the spoken word. She is a classic case study used in support of the notion of a "critical period" of psychological development. By the time she was discovered and released, her brain had essentially stopped growing and was hard-wired. It had not formed essential structures necessary for many complex human thought processes.
I remember reading about that. There was also another girl, I think, who was found when she was about 5 who had been deprived of social contact and locked up somewhere. They couldn't make her stop doing socially unacceptable things, like touching strangers in public places and things like that. Something, some check mechanism in her was 'broken' (or more likely just dead or undeveloped).
Talulah is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 12:24 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amen-Moses
Well I must admit that when I'm bashing the bishop or tugging the todger it is definitely a detailed exploration of my sexuality!
Now, now, Amen-Moses. Don't be so, erm, hard on yourself. I'm sure what goes on in your head is of an extensively detailed depravity, basic hand gestures notwithstanding.

The material point, of course, is that issues of pre-pubescent sexual exploration are not so easily addressed using Genie as an example because the circumstances of her childhood are so atypical.
livius drusus is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 01:31 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Norwich, England
Posts: 146
Default

See 'Sex and Childhood Innocence'.
VivaHedone is offline  
Old 03-11-2003, 03:31 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, Québec
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Talulah
I remember reading about that. There was also another girl, I think, who was found when she was about 5 who had been deprived of social contact and locked up somewhere. They couldn't make her stop doing socially unacceptable things, like touching strangers in public places and things like that. Something, some check mechanism in her was 'broken' (or more likely just dead or undeveloped).

Broken you say ? You make it sounds as if acting in a way acceptable to society is a genetic tray. But what is truly genetic is the way children imitate and absorb what is around them, including social norms.

Indeed, her "social mechanism" was not broken, simply because it was never built to begin with. The "mechanism" that prevent us from doing "socially unacceptable" things is purely a social construction. Essentially, "normal", civilised children are being told again and again to act in a socially acceptable way : it become hard-wired in their brain. By being isolated from society, she was also isolated from social "brainwashing".
Guillaume is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.