FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2003, 06:51 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default I Abe Smith have LIED.

In the thread at this subforum Titled "Vatican"s Twisted Knickers" , I, Abe Smith, (now standing here in sackcloth & pouring ashes over my head)
COMMITTED A MAJOR FAULT, which anyone who wishes can label a
LIE.
I stated in that OP at that thread that

"HUMANKIND HAVE ** 48** CHROMOSOMES."

That assertion of mine is a BLATANT FALSEHOOD. I apologise to all members & to anyone else whom my ERROR or LIE if you prefer has led astray..

Humankind DO NOT HAVE FORTY-*EIGHT* Chromosomes!!!!!!

So far as we know at present (= early 2003), humankind =
Homo sapiens, the species, have
FORTY-*SIX* chromosomes. Please correct this FACT in you-all's data-stores. (The other allegations in my OP >>>> including those about the human X and Y (=sex) chromosomes, remain true/correct, so far as we know in January 2003.)

(There is a reason for my error, my UNJUSTIFIED , FOOLISH, and CULPABLE LIE/ERROR. When I first learnt Biology way back in *1945*, I was Taught the erroneous pseudo-datum: my Bio professors & textbooks all believed, *in 1945*, that
forty *EIGHT* was the correct number. Only some decades later the (so-far-correct) correct number of human chromosomes was found to be (>>>> so-far) FORTY *SIX*. Repeat,
Forty **SIX** human chromosomes.)

48 is a very lovable number, of course == The Well-Tempered
Clavier, for one thing...

I APOLOGISE FOR HAVING PERPETRATED THIS ERROR/LIE.
in hoc signo >> Abe Smith
abe smith is offline  
Old 01-15-2003, 08:13 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 1,248
Default

To be guilty of lying, one must be trying to deceive. Specifically:

(1)One deliberately states or implies something to be true one actually believes to be untrue;
(2)the purpose is deception of the listener.

If you didn't do this, you have merely made a mistake. You may be culpable for the mistake, if there is cause to think you should know the facts and you haven't made the effort to check them first. Nevertheless, it would still be a mistake and not a lie.
Ernest Sparks is offline  
Old 01-15-2003, 08:45 AM   #3
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I Abe Smith have LIED.

Hello ABE, Have you not wondered why nobody noticed your error?
 
Old 01-17-2003, 07:05 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default Not too-much, Amos.

Response to your qy just-preceding, Amos.
If no-one caught my error because no-one bothers to read my post(s), that's perfectly okay wid me, Amos. I drop my message-bottles into the here-ocean, and if anyone intercepts it/them, or doesn't intercept, that's okay.
BUT if anyone *did * read my post and was uninformed of the FACT (Which I have erred about), and went away carrying my ERROR in his/her own data -store as if it were TRUE, then I AM bothered. Hence my need to correct.
I acknowledge ("and bewail".... Naw.) that I probably do talk too-much, Amos. OTOH, your posts outnumber mine
considribbly......
abe smith is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 08:53 AM   #5
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not too-much, Amos.

Quote:
Originally posted by abe smith
Response to your qy just-preceding, Amos.
If no-one caught my error because no-one bothers to read my post(s), that's perfectly okay wid me, Amos.
You're a gentleman abe, and don't feel bad because many people have told me that they don't read my post because they are also troubled by them.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.