FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-11-2003, 02:35 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 318
Default Seneca's Name Next to James'?

THE 11TH LETTER OF SENECA TO [PAUL] {JAMES}

Greetings, [Paul] {James}, my beloved. If a man as great as you, and LOVED BY ALL, is to be joined in some ways to me – then your Seneca would be entirely satisfied. Since you occupy the [highest mountain peaks] {heavenly places}, do you not think that I should rejoice to be considered as associated with you, and even second to you? Wherefore, do not think that you are unworthy to place your name in the first place ON YOUR LETTERS. Otherwise, I shall suppose that you are only jesting with me, and not praising me. You are fully aware of this because you are a Roman citizen. On the other hand, I should wish that my position were yours, and that yours were mine. Farewell, my beloved Paul.

This letter becomes entirely appropriate if James the lord is its writer. Seneca then holds James in the greatest respect, says that James is loved by all, and is happy to have his name in the SECOND place on James’ letters.

[ ] Read out

{ } Read in

1 Cor. 1:1 – [Paul] {James}, called to be an apostle [of Christ Jesus] by the [will] {Spirit} of God, and our brother [Sosthenes] {Seneca}, to etc.

1 Thess. 1:1 [Paul] {James}, [Silas] {Seneca} and [Timothy] {Titus} to etc.

2 Thess. 1:1 [Paul] {James}, [Silas] {Seneca} and {Timothy] {Titus} to etc.

Geoff
Geoff Hudson is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 02:39 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 318
Default Re: Seneca's Name Next to James'?

Quote:
Originally posted by Geoff Hudson
THE 11TH LETTER OF SENECA TO [PAUL] {JAMES}



This letter becomes entirely appropriate if James the lord is its writer.
Sorry - receiver, not writer.

Geoff
Geoff Hudson is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 06:12 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 854
Default

I'm not familiar with the context of this letter...
Psycho Economist is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 06:18 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Why do you not think that this is pious forgery? And why does it make any sense if James were the recipient? Paul, not James, was reputed to be a Roman citizen in Acts.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.