FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2003, 11:31 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1162 easy freeway minutes from the new ICR in TX
Posts: 896
Default Blast from the past -- Woody's misuse of the median revisited...

A recent talk.origins post (message-id <23ffb2b1.0301231611.6da3529d@posting.google.com >) shows a nice example of how creationists quietly sweep their blunders under a rug instead of forthrightly admitting them.

Long-time C/E debate followers are certainly aware of John Woodmorappe's sneaky median/mean switcharoo in his "Noah's Ark Feasibility Study" and in the associated ICR Impact article #273.


In the current version of ICR impact article #273 ( http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-273.htm), paragraph #8 reads as follows:

Because there have been so many arguments which allege the impossibility of eight people caring for so many animals, I delved into actual manpower studies on the time required to care for a given number of animals under various conditions. It turns out that simple labor-saving techniques could have enabled eight people to care for 16,000 animals assuming the availability of only rustic tools, along with a 10-hour day, 6-day week, with time to spare.



However, if you use www.archive.org to dig up a year-old copy of that ICR Impact article, this is what you'll find in paragraph #8 (emphasis added):

Because there have been so many arguments which allege the impossibility of eight people caring for so many animals, I delved into actual manpower studies on the time required to care for a given number of animals under various conditions. It turns out that simple labor-saving techniques could have enabled eight people to care for 16,000 rat-sized animals assuming the availability of only rustic tools, along with a 10-hour day, 6-day week, with time to spare.


(An emacs "ediff" comparison of the two versions reveals this to be the only change in the article.)
S2Focus is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 12:03 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

everyone knows that kinds means rat sized species, so what the hell is the problem?
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 12:36 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,302
Default

Hell - I could care for 16,000 rats all by myself.

Shame that elephants are not rat-sized...
pangloss is offline  
Old 01-25-2003, 07:40 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pangloss
Hell - I could care for 16,000 rats all by myself.

Shame that elephants are not rat-sized...
They were before the flood! Lying evilutionist swine! You will burn in hell for your mockery of GOD's HOLY WORD! Evilution is a lie of the devil! IS SO! IS SO! IS SO!
tgamble is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.